Archives for July 2014

Tory hopefuls urged to fight sale of AltaLink

Calgary Herald

Monday, July 14, 2014

The men running to become the next Progressive Conservative leader – and Alberta premier – say they are closely watching the proposed sale of AltaLink as the debate heats up over the planned purchase of the transmission company by Berkshire Hathaway.

ATCO recently took out full-page newspaper ads warning of “serious consequences” if AltaLink’s current owner, Montreal-based SNC-Lavalin, is allowed to sell the company to the United States firm, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett.

The provincial NDP has already called for the $3.2-billion deal – which must be approved by both the province’s arm’s-length Alberta Utilities Commission and the federal government – to be killed.

NDP MLA Dave Eggen wants the PC government and the Tory leadership candidates to call on federal industry minister James Moore to block the deal, saying it fails the net benefit test spelled out in legislation.

“I think the feds have the best opportunity,” said the Edmonton-Calder MLA, one of two candidates seeking the provincial NDP leadership.

“I challenge the Conservative leadership candidates to make themselves heard on this. It’s a multibilliondollar project but more than that, it’s … access and control of a public service.”

Eggen said stopping the deal should be a prelude to returning the transmission

lines to public control.

Foreign takeovers have been the subject of political battles in the past, with the most notable recent example being Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall’s full-court press in 2010 to get Ottawa to block the sale of Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan to BHP Billiton.

AltaLink owns roughly 12,000 kilometres of transmission lines and 280 substations in the province. It provides electricity to the majority – about 85 per cent – of Albertans.

PC leadership candidate Thomas Lukaszuk said that given Alberta’s reliance on export markets for energy and other resources, “we can’t afford to be protectionist.”

But the Edmonton-Castle Downs MLA said as premier he would want to sit down with the companies to determine whether the sale was in the best interests of Albertans.

“There is nothing wrong with a situation like this, when the deal is of this magnitude, to render an opinion,” said the former deputy premier.

Former federal cabinet minister Jim Prentice noted the province has the ability to provide input to the federal review and “the two regulatory hurdles for this are extremely high.”

But he told the Herald’s editorial board last week that the province needs to look closely at the deal.

“It’s clearly a significant transaction. It has major long-term implications for us in terms of who owns our infrastructure,” Prentice said. “We need to be careful. We need to review it.”

As the federal industry minister in 2008, Prentice blocked the sale of the space division of Macdonald Dettwiler and Associates to an American firm for national security reasons.

Calgary-Hays MLA Ric McIver said foreign investment is “very much a federal issue” but Alberta’s interests must be paramount in Ottawa’s review. “The province needs to take a hard look at this … and if it has concerns to bring those concerns to the federal government,” he said.

Both Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith and Liberal Leader Raj Sherman say they have concerns about the deal but aren’t calling for it to be blocked at this point.

Premier Dave Hancock, who is serving on an interim basis until PC party members vote for a new leader in September, said it would be inappropriate for him to make any comment on the proposed sale.

[email protected]

white

‘We will continue to be run by Albertans’: AltaLink on proposed sale to American conglomerate

ATCO criticizes AltaLink sale

Why are two of Alberta’s biggest power companies unhappy with each other? We look at the simmering feud between ATCO and AltaLink with Duane Bratt from Mount Royal University

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/Calgary/Audio/ID/2471353543/

white

Man claims Altalink construction caused damage

Mountain View Gazette

Tuesday, Jul 08, 2014 06:00 am | BY Kevin Vink

Mountain View County resident Norman Fritzler says construction of the new Altalink transmission line in the district has caused damage to his home.

Workers have been joining transmission cables together with ground-level implosive connectors near the Fritzler residence.

Although his house is about 1,000 feet from the construction site, Fritzler says the vibration and sound has caused problems at his home, which is 12 kilometres northwest of Didsbury.

“It’s sound as well as vibration. We actually feel the vibration in both our house and shop,” said Fritzler.

Not only is it the noise and vibration – both buildings have also sustained palpable damage, he said.

The acrylic stucco of the house has stress cracks near the support systems of the residence, some plastic moulding has been cracked, and some stonework on the front veranda has also cracked, he said, noting he also suspects the house has shifted somewhat because besides the cracks, one door is now hard to open and close.

“You know that’s what it appears to be. There must have been enough vibration or shifting to cause some of these cracks, and until such time as there’s a study done on it, it will he hard to really determine if (that’s the case),” he said.

“We’ve had some drywall issues, nails popping (on the drywall in the basement), as well as in the shop,” he continued, adding that he has two tenants who rent out a room in his shop, and their ceiling drywall has split apart and is now drooping somewhat.”

Fritzler has brought out the contractor who installed the stucco four years ago, and he says the contractor told him the cracks are stress-related, due to shifting of some sort.

After receiving calls from Fritzler, Altalink sent a forensic expert to the property to examine the damage.

Peter Brodsky, manager of external communications for Altalink, confirmed that the company did receive calls from Fritzler and has send out an inspector to take a look at the damage.

“That gentleman, who is a specialist of ground vibration and air pressure changes is currently working up a report based on his visit. So we don’t have any results at this point. Until we have the results available we can’t make a statement,” said Brodsky.

The report is still being compiled and may not be finished for a number of weeks, he noted, adding that the company has not had any problems using the technology in the past.

“We’ve been using this technology for quite some time and this is the first time we have ever heard from a landowner regarding physical damage attributed to implosion work,” he said.

“I cannot speak specifically about any negotiations with Mr. Fritzler directly, but really what we’re going to do is wait until we have a report in hand (and) negotiate directly with him, but at this point no decision has been made about possible cause and remuneration.”

He added he respects that Fritzler has concerns and that the company is concerned as well, and will work with him to reach a resolution.

white

NDP leader wants Alberta Utilities Commission to reject AltaLink sale

CP  |  By The Canadian Press Posted: 05/02/2014 10:12 pm EDT  |  Updated: 07/02/2014 5:59 am EDT

EDMONTON – NDP Leader Brian Mason says the province needs to ask the Alberta Utilities Commission to reject the sale of AltaLink to an American company.

It was announced earlier this week that SNC-Lavalin will be selling the energy transmission company to AltaLink to U.S. Berkshire Hathaway Energy for $3.2 billion.

Mason says that this would allow and American company to reap the benefits of Alberta taxpayers, and could ultimately drive energy prices up.

He says Alberta’s transmission system should not be an internationally traded commodity because that will just raise prices.

If approved, the sale will go through December 31.

With 12,000 kilometres of transmission lines and 280 substations. AltaLink provides electricity to the majority of the province.

(CHED)

white

Atco behind anonymous newspaper ads slamming AltaLink sale

Calgary Herald

Thursday, July 03, 2014

EDMONTON – Utilities giant Atco says it paid for anonymous ads in Alberta newspapers this week warning of “serious consequences” if AltaLink is sold to Berkshire Hathaway Energy, controlled by American billionaire Warren Buffett.

The ads, some titled “We’re Losing Control,” appeared in the Edmonton Journal, Calgary Herald, Edmonton Sun, Calgary Sun, Fort McMurray Today and some rural papers.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy announced on May 1 that it intends to purchase AltaLink – Alberta’s largest electricity transmission provider – from current owner SNC Lavalin of Montreal.

The $3.2-billion deal is expected to close Dec. 31 but needs approval from the Alberta Utilities Commission and the federal government.

A full-page ad in Thursday’s Journal and Herald warned of “serious consequences for the province we call home” if the sale is approved: loss of control of critical infrastructure, a lack of regulation south of the U.S. border and the “potential for more power exports.”

Nancy Southern, chairwoman, president and CEO of Atco Ltd., confirmed Atco paid for the ads. There wasn’t a need to disclose to readers that the message was from Atco, she said.

“The reason for not putting our name on it is it isn’t about Atco or AltaLink,” Southern said. “It’s about a principle, and a discussion that Canadians, and Albertans, should have.”

She said Albertans haven’t had enough time to consider the deal and its implications. Southern said she’s not opposed to direct foreign investment in Canada, but the transmission grid is different.

It’s the “lifeblood” of the electricity industry and shouldn’t fall into American ownership, beyond the reach of Canadian regulators, she said.

AltaLink president and CEO Scott Thon said the ads “smacked of self-interest.” He said he questioned why they were anonymous.

“The only conclusion I can bring is that you want them to be anonymous because you want them to spread misinformation, and that’s what these ads do,” Thon said before refuting each of the claims in the ads.

“AltaLink will continue to be an independent Alberta company run by Albertans,” he said. “It will be regulated by the Alberta Utilities Commission and it will have operational oversight by the independent AESO (Alberta Electric System Operator).”

The sale can’t lead to an increase in power exports, he said. AltaLink doesn’t own the power it moves, and Alberta is a net importer of electrical power, not an exporter.

“We’ll continue to be transparent,” Thon said. “We’ll continue to give people the facts.”

The ads encouraged people with concerns about the sale to contact their MLAs, the federal industry minister or the utilities commission.

AUC spokesman Jim Law said the commission had received 70 emails on the issue by mid-afternoon Thursday and that more were coming in. The ads have “generated some renewed interest” in the proposed sale, Law said.

“We welcome the input directly but also remind (people) that they can provide their input to various organizations that may be representing them, such as the Utilities Consumer Advocate or the Consumers Coalition of Alberta,” Law said.

“We do have a process in place – an evidence-based public process that will evaluate the application and produce a written decision.”

The Utilities Consumer Advocate and the Consumers Coalition of Alberta have registered as interveners in the review process. Atco Electric has also registered, and has called for “an open hearing” if it’s deemed necessary.

[email protected]

Twitter.com/HowellEJ

white

Renewables not ready to meet demand for electricity

Letters to the Editor  Lethbridge Herald

July 3, 2014

I would like to respond to your recent guest column by Ben Thibault (June 18 Herald) extolling the virtues of renewables solar and wind while comparing Alberta and U.S. coal generation statistics. This is a phoney comparison since they
have 104 nuclear plants on their grid and we have none.  Until we solve the problems of large-scale storage of electricity, we cannot expect renewables to solve our emissions problems. Just because the “fuel=wind” is free does not mean wind farms are emissions free. Large amounts of carbon dioxide are generated in creating the concrete and rebar bases for wind towers, to say nothing of the steel required for the towers themselves. Depending on the size of the
installation, these towers have to be strong to handle the considerable wind forces on them. Then there is the copper for the generator and the cables, aluminum and steel for the transmission towers and lines. In the case of solar, the
“fuel=sunlight” is free but we still have problems with large-scale installations covering considerable amounts of land as well as with the chemicals used in the manufacture of the panels.  As technology currently stands in Alberta, wind power has a large installed capacity that is on the average operational about a third of the time and moonbeams don’t work for the solar. These renewables are intermittent. Other jurisdictions in the world are finding out that massive public support for renewables, although initially politically appealing, is in the long run financially costly for the public purse. Just look at Ontario for a made-in-Canada example.
We may choose to use solar, wind and batteries for our homes but that total demand is a minor part of the electricity use in the province.
Laurence G. Hoye
Diamond City

white