Quarantine comes with a ‘devastating’ cost

There are roughly 10,000 cattle under quarantine, and every animal can cost as much as $3 a day in feed and yardage

Ranches under quarantine in southeastern Alberta could be collectively losing $15,000 to $30,000 per day feeding and caring for the roughly 10,000 cattle they can neither move nor sell.

And much of that money may never be recovered, which is prompting calls for a new approach to compensating producers whose herds are being investigated for bovine tuberculosis.

“These are cow-calf producers, and they’re not able to move their calves at exactly the time of year that you would be moving them to sell them,” said Rich Smith, executive director of Alberta Beef Producers.

“Now they’re having to hold and feed their calves, and they don’t have facilities or feed for wintering their calves. And because they haven’t made any sales, they don’t have any money to purchase feed.

“It’s been devastating for those producers.”

In late September, the USDA confirmed a case of bovine tuberculosis in one cow from a farm near Jenner, and since then, around 33 farms in Alberta and two in southern Saskatchewan have been quarantined. The positive case of the disease will not change Canada’s tuberculosis-free status and should not affect trade, said Smith.

“The tuberculosis case does not have huge significance for the industry as a whole, but it’s devastating for those producers who are affected by it,” he said.

“We’ve asked the provincial government to look at AgriRecovery — which is disaster funding — to offset the costs to producers and also look at some short-term financial support to get them through this crunch.”

Producers receive fair market value for any animals that test positive for the disease and are destroyed, but “there’s no federal compensation in place to pay for those animals in terms of yardage and feed,” said veterinarian Dr. Cody Creelman.

“There are some resources available within each province — like AgriStability — that can potentially help offset some of those costs, but it’s very difficult,” said Creelman of Veterinary Agri-Health Services in Airdrie.

These guys are going from day to day, and these applications aren’t processed overnight. You have living creatures that need these resources, and I don’t know of a good solution in terms of making sure these farmers are taken care of.”

And as the quarantine stretches on, the costs will continue to climb, he added. Costs will vary depending on the price of feed and the type of winter feeding system used, but at a minimum, producers can expect to pay around $1 to $2 per head per day to feed cattle over the winter — not counting yardage costs.

“You could expect on a per-animal basis to be running between 50 cents and $1 per animal per day to keep those animals in terms of yardage,” said Creelman.

“Then it’s really dependent on what you have available for feed — whether you’re buying it, able to use some forage, or still have some saved. But it gets more and more expensive as you get into the winter.”

And for those producers who don’t have the facilities or cash flow to feed their cattle over the winter, this quarantine is quickly becoming a crisis.

“The majority of the producers on the cow-calf side is going to be lucky to break even with every factor working in their favour,” said Creelman.

“For producers, cash flow is strapped already right now because calf markets are down, but these guys have lost the ability to sell into the higher markets earlier on.

“Emergency is the perfect word for it.”

Long investigation

And the CFIA doesn’t yet know how long the quarantine will last as it begins testing the 10,000 cattle, but in a Nov. 10 statement, it said it “is not expected to be completed for several months.”

“We don’t know what the final timelines will be, but I don’t see the timelines shortening up,” said Creelman.

The “sheer size” of the herds being tested is slowing down the process, he added.

“We’re talking about very progressive producers who are running very large operations, so the logistics of being able to move those animals and implement protocols — well, I don’t think this scale was ever imagined from a regulatory standpoint,” said Creelman.

The protocols were likely designed for average cattle herds of around 100 to 200 cows, he said, and with that number, “it’s logistically feasible to run those animals through and do the tests.”

“But now we’re talking about very large herds, and I don’t think anyone thought of this scenario,” he said.

Initially, the CFIA sent only two teams to test the animals, but it has since added three more.

“That will speed the process along, but once again, we’re talking about massive amounts of cattle, and it’s very difficult to scale that test. There’s nothing you can really do to speed up the results either.”

But it’s unlikely that many more farms will be quarantined in the weeks ahead, said Smith.

“They think they’re getting close to the number of herds that will end up being quarantined, though they may have a few more,” he said. “They will be doing trace-outs of the animals that were part of the infected herd over the last five years, but that typically won’t result in quarantines of facilities. It will just identify specific animals that need to be watched.”

But the CFIA has committed to improving the “information flow” to affected producers, said Smith.

“Producers are concerned and they have a lot of questions about how the investigation is proceeding,” he said. “They made a commitment to us that they’re going to do a better job of communicating with the producers who are affected by the investigation.

“The challenge is that they’re doing an investigation, so until you get the results of the investigation, you don’t have much information to impart to people.”

Too early to blame elk

One of the unknowns is the origin of this particular case of bovine tuberculosis.

“We have no sense of where this came from,” said Smith. “This is a strain of TB that hasn’t been detected in Canada before in either livestock or wildlife, so we don’t have any sense right now of the origin of this disease.”

But the industry needs to be careful about drawing conclusions from that, said Dr. Eugene Janzen, a professor at the University of Calgary faculty of veterinary medicine.

“Other countries in the world have reported different strains than we’re familiar with,” he said.

“The science of examining those organisms — the molecular tests that we’re able to do — have probably pointed out differences that we might not have been aware of in the past.

“We’re still awaiting completion of that investigation, and while we’re awaiting that, we’re speculating quite a bit.”

The prime suspects are the 7,000 or so wild elk that roam on the Suffield military base directly south of where the infected cow came from, said Janzen.

“There’s lots of precedent for wildlife acting as a reservoir or contributing to the persistence of the problem within the cattle herd,” said Janzen. “But we have to be careful not to incriminate wildlife simply because, at this stage, we don’t know.

“Until we know for sure, (culling) is probably not a discussion we want to have.”

Creelman agrees

“It’s too soon to tell, and really, without evidence of TB within that native herd of elk or deer by culling or testing, it would be impossible to tell or do any tests on the cows to determine if that’s the case.”

Right now, the CFIA is focused on testing cattle — not elk — and aside from some “advanced passive surveillance during this hunting season,” that’s unlikely to change, said Smith.

“Ultimately, we expect that the investigation will extend out to the wildlife, but other than this enhanced passive surveillance, the current focus is on trying to get the cattle tested.”


 

Alta. MLA to join NDP – FORMER ALBERTA TORY LEADERSHIP CANDIDATE SANDRA JANSEN CROSSES FLOOR TO NDP

18 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

Dean Bennett THE CANADIAN PRESS — EDMONTON

Alberta Progressive Conservatives embracing a far-right ideology, says Jansen Aone-time candidate for the Alberta Progressive Conservative leadership has crossed the floor to the governing NDP.

Sandra Jansen, a Calgary member of the legislature, quit the Tory race last week. She said personal and online insults aimed at her progressive views had become intolerable.

She said the abuse peaked at a recent Tory policy convention when her nomination forms were vandalized and supporters of another candidate harassed her in the hallways.

Jansen, a two-term MLA, had openly indicated she was mulling whether to leave the Tory caucus and party.

She also accused leadership candidate Jason Kenney, a cabinet minister under former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper, of bringing “Trump-style politics’’ to Alberta.

“I don’t believe that there has been anything moderate or pragmatic being offered or even being discussed by the people intent on taking over the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta,” Jansen said Thursday.

Seeing the legacy of former Alberta Premier Peter Lougheed being “kicked to the curb by extremists who are taking over the PC party has been heartbreaking to me,” Jansen said.

“The tone that has been brought into Alberta politics belongs in our past,” she said.

“Most parties would describe themselves as big tent … It wasn’t big enough to fit me and I was told that over and over.”

Premier Rachel Notley said Jansen has always been a voice for moderate and progressive politics.

“We share some very important values and priorities that serve Alberta well in government,” Notley said.

Notley said the province is facing challenging times and it’s important to pull together.

“We don’t divide ourselves from each other. We don’t call each other names. We don’t harass each other. We don’t try to pull each other down,” she said.


 

Study examines Alta. quakes, with suspected link to fracking

18 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

THE CANADIAN PRESS — CALGARY

Research suggests hydraulic fracking can cause earthquakes in at least two ways — and one of them can cause tremors months after the activity stops.

“The seismicity is persistent after the operations are completed,” said David Eaton, a University of Calgary seismologist, whose paper has been published in the journal Science.

Eaton has been studying earthquakes that have shaken the Fox Creek region of northwestern Alberta for years.

The largest, measuring between 4.2 and 4.8 on the Richter scale, occurred in January. The area, which is in the centre of the Duvernay oil and gas field, has experienced hundreds of tremors since 2013.

Scientists have long known the shakers are associated with oilfield practices.

In the United States, underground waste-water disposal seems to be the cause. In Alberta, research points to hydraulic fracking, which involves pumping high-pressure fluids underground. That creates tiny cracks in rock and releases natural gas or oil held inside.

How the widely used technique creates earthquakes has largely remained a mystery — until now.

Eaton and his co-author Xuewei Bao used a mathematical algorithm to isolate and locate more than 900 earthquakes in the Fox Creek area.

“That gave us the ability to image the fault structure,” Eaton said. “We could see that there were steeply dipping faults that extended from the injection level down into the Precambrian basement.”

The pair also realized there were two hairline faults that hadn’t been spotted in previous work.

One fault, some distance from the fracking site, quaked as fluids were pumped down and stopped when the pumping did.

Eaton said those quakes were caused by stress changes on the rock from the pumping. When the pumping ended, the stress was reduced.

But the other fault, very close to the site, remained active for months.

The researchers combined their precise fault-mapping with equally precise data on how much fluid was pumped underground, when it was pumped and where.


 

Rural politicians boo Alta. climate-change plan

18 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

THE CANADIAN PRESS — EDMONTON

The Alberta government got a bit of a rough ride at a meeting with rural politicians in Edmonton.

Deputy premier Sarah Hoffman was booed Thursday as she defended the NDP’s climatechange plan, which includes a carbon tax and a phase-out of coal-fired electricity.

Hoffman said it’s necessary to address climate change because the science behind it is real and there are serious health concerns tied to burning coal.

Hoffman and other cabinet ministers fielded questions from hundreds of delegates to the fall convention of the Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties.

Premier Rachel Notley said in a speech that she understands concerns and debate is always healthy. But she told delegates that a robust climate-change plan gives Alberta more credibility as it fights for energy infrastructure such as pipelines.

“People are going to disagree sometimes, and we know that sometimes making hard decisions, particularly long-term decisions that bring about long-term repositioning and improvement for sometimes people who aren’t voters right now, that’s a little hard,” Notley said.


 

Protesters rally against carbon tax – Event draws crowd to Galt Gardens

6 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

Tijana Martin

[email protected]

A few hundred displeased people gathered at Galt Gardens on Saturday as part of a province-wide rally. The event was predominately to oppose the Climate Leadership Implementation Act.

Herald photo by Tijana Martin A few hundred people gathered at Galt Gardens Saturday to participate in a province-wide rally, mainly against the upcoming carbon levy. @TMartinHerald.Dawn Deabis attended the event because she said she’s upset with Rachel Notley and the NDP government.

“We elected her because we needed a change, but we’re all pretty sorry for what we got,” said Deabis.

She said she hopes the government listens to those in attendance. “There’s too many people out of work, there’s going to be more people out of work, everything just needs to be better so I hope the government listens.”

On Friday, Environment Minster Shannon Phillips said the carbon tax will allow the province to invest in innovation and technology and create jobs for cleaner energy. “Keeping those good jobs right here in Alberta, and cleaning up our air and getting rid of dirty coal plants,” she said. “That’s what we are reinvesting that price on pollution in.”

“I don’t believe that,” said Deabis. “They can focus on energy but it’s the oil — we’re an oil province and there’s too many people out of work and we just need to not have the carbon tax,” said Deabis. “I think it will just cause more problems for more business, more people, more money out of my pocket — out of your pocket.”

“Bring back businesses into Alberta, we’ve seen them leave, we need them to come back. The government needs to promote business to stay, not to leave and I’m hoping that’s what they’ll do,” Deabis added.

Paul Hinman, former MLA for Cardston-Taber-Warner and original leader of the Wildrose party, was a speaker at the event as he covered for Grant Hunter who was home ill.

“I was in the legislature many times when Rachel talked about how she was going to be accountable, how she’d go and listen to the people and how we need to be representing the people,” said Hinman. “I think that if you actually went doorto-door and asked people, an overwhelming number of Albertans understand that this is just another big government push to tax people more or to tax industries and it’s a political agenda.”

A $20-per-tonne carbon levy will come into effect on Jan. 1. The levy targets more than 20 types of fuel which produce greenhouse gas emissions when combusted. The Alberta government states every penny raised through the levy will be reinvested into the province to reduce our carbon footprint by making investments in energy efficiency for homeowners and small business owners.

And most Albertans, approximately 66 per cent of households, will receive a full or partial rebate. Individuals who make $47,000 a year or less and couples or families who make under $95,000 will qualify for the rebate.

But Hinman doesn’t feel this is the time to implement a new levy.

“We’re an economic basket case — we’re struggling. Do not impose a tax, this is like having someone that’s weak and barely able to move and say ‘you know what, we need you to carry 10 more pounds and putting a weight on them,” said Hinman. “Our economy cannot handle a carbon tax right now.”

Hinman suggests postponing the levy or putting it to a plebiscite.

“If you really believe you have a mandate from Albertans, then show us that don’t believe that you do with a plebiscite.”

Those in attendance signed a petition which urged the Provincial Legislative Assembly to hold a referendum on the matter, but Hinman said the people must do more.

“The biggest message for people today is signing these petitions are great, but I’ve been in the house when Rachel herself has put many petitions to the table there presented to the government and government carries on,” said Hinman. “What we need to do is we need to start a movement of phoning, emailing and sending letters to the premier’s office, to Shannon Phillip’s office, to the energy minister’s office, finance minster’s office and absolutely bombarding them with an overwhelming number of people calling them and say ‘please postpone the carbon tax.’”

More information on the Climate Leadership Implementation Act can be found at www.finance.alberta.ca/ publica tions/tax_rebates/faqs_carbonlevy. Follow @TMartinHerald on Twitter


 

Opposition leader slams carbon tax – Brian Jean says it will make economy worse

6 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

Rob Drinkwater THE CANADIAN PRESS— EDMONTON

Alberta’s Opposition leader told hundreds of people at a rally against a planned carbon tax that the province’s oil belongs to them. Brian Jean stressed that no one at Saturday’s rally at the legislature was blaming Notley for low energy prices that have hurt Alberta’s economy.

But Brian Jean says Notley’s carbon tax is going to make things worse.

Other rallies were held at the same time in other Alberta cities, and organizers circulated a petition calling for the government to hold a referendum on the carbon tax.

Tracy Leite, who spoke at the rally, said the business she and her husband started together has been forced to lay people off.

Leite says Notley wouldn’t understand unless she had to sit across from someone and tell them they were losing their job.

“Not every business owner is a highly-paid executive. I’m hanging on by a fingernail,” Leite told the crowd.

On Jan. 1, a new carbon tax kicks in, which will increase prices at the gas pumps and on heating bills. There will be full or partial rebates for lowand middle-income Albertans.

Environment Minister Shannon Phillips also introduced Bill 25 in the legislature Tuesday that, if passed, will forbid oilsands industries from collectively emitting more than 100 megatonnes of greenhouse gases a year. The bill is part of a multi-faceted plan being introduced in stages by Notley’s government to reduce the effects of climate change and to remake Alberta’s energy infrastructure into one that relies more on renewables such as wind, solar and hydro power.

Some people at the Edmonton rally questioned whether climate change was really a problem. Others acknowledged it, but said a carbon tax would only kick Alberta when it’s already down and wouldn’t stop carbon emitters like the U.S. and China.

Alicia Drader, a journeyman electrician who attended the rally, said green investment is a good thing, but said it won’t change things overnight. In the meantime, he said hasn’t worked since January and his EI benefits will run out in four weeks.

“It’s very stressing to not know what’s next, to now know what to do next.

“When you’ve exhausted sending out 200 resumes and you get a few phone calls and a handful of job interviews and then you end up having maybe 500 people going for two positions, it’s very challenging to get working,” Drader said.

“There’s a lot of people struggling.”

Jean told the crowd that Alberta’s oil is being “mishandled.”

He rejected Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent announcement that all provinces will need to set a baseline price for carbon by 2018, saying it’s potentially unconstitutional because it challenges the province’s right to manage its own natural resources.

“Our oil, our natural resources belong to us.

“They do not belong to Rachel Notley. They do not belong to Trudeau. They belong to the people of Alberta,” Jean told the crowd.


 

Stirling considering wind farm – ENVIRONMENT MINISTER OPTIMISTIC ABOUT POTENTIAL FROM PROPOSED PROJECT

7 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

J.W. Schnarr
[email protected]

Following an open house at the end of October, the Village of Stirling is looking for ways the community can benefit from a large wind farm project currently being considered near the community.

During their regular meeting on Nov. 2, Stirling council discussed the results of an Oct. 26 open house on the proposed wind farm, and how the village could work with GreenGate Power.

“In my mind, it’s us being proactive,” said Mayor Ben Nilsson.

“I think there’s a great opportunity for us to do something here.”

Coun. Trevor Lewington said council could provide conditional support for the project and could use that support to encourage GreenGate to address issues put forward by area residents and to consider providing opportunities to the community.

Among the issues the village is looking to address is traffic management, environmental safety concerns, purchasing and procurement from local services, local employment opportunities, emergency response training and plans, and opportunities for ongoing social investment.

The project began development in 2007 and plans include about 17,000 acres of land located five kilometres northeast of Stirling on privately owned cultivated land.

The project will be about 133 megawatts in size and could begin construction in 2018. It could involve the construction of 46 wind turbines, an electrical collection system, access roads, and a new wind collector substation, called the Red Coat Substation.

On Friday, Environment Minister Shannon Phillips said there are more opportunities for municipalities to be part of large-scale energy projects.

“We’ve seen this approach from wind developers in particular, and other renewables developers ensuring community benefits,” she said. “Certainly around Vulcan and Carmangay, we’ve seen those kinds of arrangements. It’s great that the municipalities are looking at ways to ensure local employment and local economic benefits.”

She said she expects to see more of that growth in the future.

“Southern Alberta is the birthplace of Canadian wind energy industry,” she said. “We’ve already got many success stories of places that have raised their municipal tax base, and certainly benefitted from having that kind of energy in their communities.

“We have a number of advocates here in southern Alberta who are pleased to welcome that kind of opportunity.”

“I think, as we move forward with an expansion of renewables, there’s going to be more down here in southern Alberta, but more across the province as well,” she said. “We will find that there will be many more of these arrangements, whether it is local training, local hiring, or even some of the assembly and manufacturing opportunities.”


 

Economic growth key to decisions – SPENDING PROGRAMS MUST GROW ECONOMY: FINANCE MINISTER

4 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

Jordan Press

THE CANADIAN PRESS — OTTAWA

Any new spending measures being pitched for the federal budget will have to demonstrate potential to help grow the economy if they expect to find favour with the Liberal government, Canada’s finance minister says.

In an interview with The Canadian Press, Bill Morneau said that as he crafts his second budget as finance minister, the economic-growth test is the first of multiple screens he is using to ensure debt levels don’t spiral out of control.

Too late, the opposition parties might jeer.

The Liberals used up a lot of their fiscal wiggle room this week with a fall economic update that included $32 billion in infrastructure spending over the next 11 years, accompanied by an equivalent amount of red ink on the federal books.

The document also warned the federal balance sheet would stay in the red even longer than the Liberals first promised — a total of $114.9 billion in deficits between 2016-17 and 2020-21, up from the $83.2 billion outlined in the last budget.

Nor have the Liberals said when they expect to see the budget back in balance, instead choosing to hold to a decidedly less sexy measure of ongoing fiscal prudence: the ratio of debt to gross domestic product.

In order for that figure to remain on a downward trajectory, the economy must grow at a faster rate than the debt, Morneau explained.

“That means that we’ve got to be thinking about all of our investment decisions in the context of how they enable us to grow the economy,” Morneau said. “That will be my screen as we think about Budget 2017 and beyond: How we can grow the economy and be fiscally prudent? Certainly it will present a challenge, but we believe that with this plan we can make a real impact on Canadian families.”

Building a budget involves complex tradeoffs between doing things that have to be done for short- and medium-term growth and those measures that may have to wait for another budget cycle, he added.

“Is there a way to do more with less? Is there a way to consider being more cost-effective against every initiative? That’s my ongoing approach to dealing with the things I’m hearing from Canadians and the things I’m hearing from my colleagues.”

In doubling down on an infrastructure program that was originally pegged at $60 billion over 10 years but now totals nearly $100 billion, the Liberals are hoping that program can spur growth and jobs, creating the tax base needed to help balance the budget.

Some of those changes won’t be felt right away — spending infrastructure money takes time and only leaves the federal treasury once project proponents submit receipts to show that work has progressed — and Morneau suggested that Canadians won’t see the effects of the long-term plan in the fiscal update for several years.

But the government believes its changes to tax rates for so-called middle-income earners, along with a new income-tested child benefit and short-term infrastructure spending, will create or maintain 100,000 jobs over the next two years, Morneau said — even though the parliamentary budget watchdog has cast doubt on the figure.


 

Carbon tax the best answer? – TAX WILL PLACE GREATER FINANCIAL BURDEN ON FAMILIES

4 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

Rachael Harder

Canada was just ranked the top destination of the year by Lonely Planet’s 2017 travel guide. This ranking is based on Canada’s diversity. From the majestic beauty of the Niagara Falls, to the still beauty of Banff and Churchill, the old European architecture of Quebec City and Montreal, to the quaint fishermen’s community of Peggy’s Cove; Canada offers vibrancy, innovation and a warm welcome to all who visit.

Canada’s natural landscape and vast greenspace make our country unique. I am proud to be able to represent this beautiful nation. In order to maintain Canada’s beauty, however, we must be respectful towards the landscape we have. To preserve the elegance of Canada, maintenance of national parks and national historic sites is necessary.

Under our former Conservative government, we established climate targets for Canada. These targets would help us to preserve Canada’s natural beauty. Ironically, they were consistently attacked by the Liberals who have since adopted these same climate target goals. However, the Liberals have added something on top of them: a carbon tax.

A carbon tax places a price on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from burning fuel. It puts a price on each tonne of GHG emitted and is then taxed accordingly. Prime Minister Trudeau recently announced that the Liberal government would impose a “floor price” of $10 per tonne in 2018, rising to $50 a tonne by 2022.

The purpose of taxing these emissions is to increase the cost of using fossil fuels to encourage businesses and families to switch to alternative energy sources. This works better in theory than in reality. Imposing a carbon tax does not put a limit on the amount of emissions that can be released. A manufacturing company can continue releasing the same amount of emissions they do now; the only difference is that businesses will now be taxed for it — and those increased costs will be passed to you, the consumer, in the form of higher prices.

Provinces will not release fewer emissions than they did previously, as most people don’t have a choice if they drive a pickup truck or heat their home with natural gas. However, under the Liberal carbon tax, the residents of the province will have to somehow pay for it. Because of the carbon tax, every product you purchase and every household bill you pay will go up in cost.

To put this in perspective, in British Columbia there is a provincial carbon tax. This tax places a $30 per tonne price on carbon, adding 6.67 cents per litre at the gas pump. It makes B.C. the second most expensive province for gas prices in all of Canada, just behind Newfoundland and Labrador. In Alberta, if a carbon tax is fully implemented in 2018, gas prices will be roughly the same as in B.C. With the Liberal goal of $50 per tonne by 2022, gas prices will increase by at least 11 cents per litre.

A carbon tax will also mean significant increases to the price of heating your home. In Alberta, where we heat most of our houses using natural gas, under the carbon tax, there will be an increased tax of $1.50 a gigajoule. Although it may not seem significant at first, after one cold winter the difference will be alarming. It has been estimated that if this carbon tax is imposed on Canada, Alberta will be the most affected by the rise of electricity costs.

This increase in natural gas and electricity will also affect businesses, meaning the prices of non-energy products are also likely to increase. This, of course, directly affects households as they will be forced to spend more on everyday items like groceries and transportation.

Overall, it is estimated that with a $50 per tonne carbon tax, the average Canadian household will end up paying $600 per year. This amount will go up if you drive your own vehicle instead of taking public transit or if you own your own house instead of a condo. With the prices of everyday living already increasing, the carbon tax will have a detrimental impact on household budgets. With instability in the housing market and job loss on the rise, the last thing Canadians need from their government is another tax.

This carbon tax is the wrong approach to reaching climate targets and stimulating the economy. Forcing provinces to adopt a carbon tax is not in the best interest of Canadians — or Canada’s climate. Canadians will not stop purchasing groceries that were shipped to their local supermarket, quit heating their homes, or stop driving to work (especially in a place like Lethbridge). Therefore, carbon will still be released into the environment at the same rate it is now. The only difference the carbon tax will make is impose greater financial burden on families and kill jobs.

I know we are all tough Albertans who can brave the coldest of winters, but there does come a time when turning on the heat is nice. I for one do not want to pay extra tax for choosing not to be a human icicle, and as your Member of Parliament, I don’t think you should either.

white

PALLISER – 21 recommendations presented to board

4 Nov 2016

Lethbridge Herald

Follow @JWSchnarrHerald on Twitter

LETHBRIDGE HERALD

Citing a “culture and climate that is not psychologically healthy for employees,” an organizational review of Palliser Regional Schools has come back with 21 recommendations to improve the division.

Herald photo by Ian Martens Palliser Regional Schools board chair Robert Strauss, flanked by acting superintendent Garry Andrews and alternate vice-chair Craig Whitehead, speaks during a special meeting after the release of an organizational review Thursday at the division offices. @IMartensHeraldA special meeting held Thursday by the PRS Board of Trustees to hear the results of the review was attended by a full house of concerned parents and former employees of the division.

Robert Strauss, PRS board chair, said because the board received the recommendations at the same time the public did, it would now be looking deeper into the review in order to see where changes to the division could be made.

“The board is going to treat this report with the utmost seriousness,” he said. “We’ll spend the requisite amount of time to review the documents in great detail.”

The panel gathered information from stakeholders in the division that included a survey of the psychological safety climate within PRS; semistructured interviews with current and former employees, trustees and other stakeholders; documentary submissions from stakeholders; and data and documents requested from PRS. Recommendations included the division creating a plan to deal with aggression and fear in the workplace felt by many employees; clarifying the roles of the board and superintendent; identify and deal with a lack of trust of the board; the board must take ownership of the superintendent evaluation process; manage concerns with procedural fairness; develop a transparent conflict resolution process; improve communication at all levels of the division; develop an off-duty conduct policy; transparency in their electronic monitoring policy; develop a policy that clarifies when alcohol should and should not be purchased; and to develop a communications policy in order to keep the public informed.

As the full review is more than 200 pages long, Strauss could not give a timeline on any decisions that might come out of it.

“We will take as much time as we need to do a thorough job and do it right,” he said, adding it would be unlikely the review would be dealt with in the next board meeting.

“During the course of upcoming weeks and months, we’ll have an opportunity to address this report.”

He said the division has many positive traits, and the board will look at the recommendations as an opportunity to improve areas that are lacking.

“We also heard today this division has a lot of positives in it,” he said. “We have a lot of things we need to look at for improvement. And we welcome that challenge.”

Strauss described the division as a partnership between staff, parents and students, and said the board welcomes the opportunity to work with those groups.

“I was very appreciative for the interest that the parents and the public have shown,” he said.

“This is part of our commitment to work with the people in our system, and to work with the public to create a better system. It’s my intent to work with the stakeholders to ensure we do get better.”

The executive summary is available online at pallisersd.ab.ca.