Bad weather cancels sugar beet harvest in southern Alberta

Sugar beet farmers are suffering in southern Alberta after severe cold and frost affected this year’s harvest.

Michael Franklin, Senior Digital Producer


Published Friday, November 8, 2019 1:59PM MST
Last Updated Friday, November 8, 2019 5:39PM MST

LETHBRIDGE – After a long, cold and wet summer, southern Alberta farmers won’t be able to harvest their damaged crops after Canada’s largest sugar company said it doesn’t have the capacity to process it.

Rogers Sugar Inc. announced Thursday, following an analysis in partnership with the Alberta Sugar Beet Growers, that it would not be harvesting any more sugar beets due to “severe snow and frost damage.”

As a result, only about 60,000 to 70,000 metric tonnes of refined sugar is expected to come from this year’s crop.

Sugar beets are grown by over 200 families in the southern Alberta region and supplies between eight and nine per cent of Canada’s sugar.

According to CTV Lethbridge weather special Dory Rossiter, ‘snowmaggedon’ in September dropped over 60 cm of snow in the region.

“In the far south of the province, we experienced only four days above 30 degrees during June, July and August. We also had 27 days of below average temperatures and 89 mm of rain, in total, during those same months.”

It’s believed only 55 per cent of the sugar beet crop was harvested before the company called off operations.

Rogers says it is looking at a number of options to provide sugar to its customers, including relying heavily on an excess supply of cane sugar from refineries in Vancouver and Montreal.

Farmers lose — and weeds win — when energy companies walk away

When well sites are abandoned, the rent cheques 
often stop while the noxious weeds flourish

By Jeff Melchior
Published: October 9, 2019
Alberta Farmer Express

Kochia has taken over this abandoned well site and stands nearly as tall as Kevin Serfas. The Turin farmer says his calls to the energy companies that own several dozen similar sites on his family’s farming operation go unanswered. And managing the weeds would require “a full-time guy,” he said. Photo: Supplied

 “Kochia six feet tall and completely covering the whole leases. We have many that look like this. When I phone, no one even answers the phones.”

This tweet from Lethbridge-area farmer Kevin Serfas in August likely could have been written by any one of hundreds of Alberta producers with abandoned well sites on their farms.

At last count, there were 150,000 energy leases in the province considered “orphaned” or inactive with no solid plans to reclaim them — some abandoned decades ago.

And those numbers from the Orphan Well Association inventory are on the low side, said Daryl Bennett, a farmer and director with the Alberta Surface Rights Federation.

“There are far more orphans than there are in the Orphan Well Association inventory and there’s a lot more coming,” said Bennett, citing Trident Exploration (a Calgary-based junior oil and gas company which ceased operation in May) as an example.

“Trident alone has 4,600 wells that haven’t hit the orphan well inventory yet.”

That leaves farmers such as Serfas not only dealing with unpaid rent but also having to figure out what to do with weeds. Kochia is a particularly bad one — not only a prolific seed producer but adept at developing herbicide resistance.

And even though he’s one of the biggest farm operators in the province (he and his family farm more than 50,000 acres), attempting to cut the kochia himself would be a logistical nightmare.

“I could manage them but with 50 or 60 leases on my property I would have to hire a full-time guy,” Serfas said.

This photo of an abandoned well site north of Lomond was supplied by Patricia Walker of My Landman Group, which helps landowners with surface rights issues. “The fence is to keep the kochia in!” she said in describing the site. The sign states: “This site is under the management of the Orphan Well Association.”photo: Supplied

The option of doing the work and billing the companies for the expense isn’t realistic either. Several unsuccessful attempts to reach some of the companies by phone and email have led him to wonder if they even still exist.

Nevertheless, several dry years in a row in southern Alberta have forged the perfect breeding conditions for kochia, which produces tumbleweeds that can spread its seeds far and wide. For producers with infected leases, it will likely fall on them to cut and spray it.

Kochia is difficult to manage and spreads quickly but has to be dealt with, said Charles Geddes, an Agriculture Canada researcher in Lethbridge.

“Everybody should take responsibility for (kochia),” he said. “If the plant is growing into the fall and has that tumbleweed structure, it should be cut off to stop it from tumbling away, which contributes to the expansion of this problem from field to field.”

A worsening situation

Aside from maintenance, the big question on the minds of many producers with abandoned wells on their properties is, “How am I going to be compensated?”

In January, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a landmark case dealing with failed oil and gas company Redwater Energy that bankrupt or insolvent energy companies must fulfil their environmental obligations before paying back creditors, including landowners.

But reclamation takes money, and lenders are not in a rush to come to the rescue of bankrupt companies, said Bennett. And the ruling has compounded the problems for ones struggling to survive, he added.

“It’s definitely made it harder for the smaller companies especially to get financing,” he said. “A lot of these companies are the ones neglecting to do proper weed control and maintain things.

“I talked to the vice-president of one company and he just said, ‘Look, we just don’t have the money.’”

Many companies are in that position, he added.

“It paints a pretty grim picture but that’s not the farmer’s issue. Farmers are entitled to have those leases taken care of in a timely manner and to receive their annual compensation.”

So what can producers do? Not much, said Bennett.

They can write to the Alberta Surface Rights Board and ask for help getting unpaid rent money for leases, but they will likely have to be patient.

“The surface rights board is at a crisis point,” he said. “It has a huge backlog, it doesn’t have enough staff and it probably has a limited budget. In some cases you can expect two years to have your annual compensation paid to you.”

As for getting companies to come out and cut kochia and other weeds, don’t hold your breath. “You can’t force anybody to take care of the weeds. The Orphan Well Association generally does not take care of weeds.”

High-maintenance weed

Southern Alberta continues to battle a growing population of kochia, having faced its third consecutive year of the dry conditions in which the tumbleweed thrives, said Geddes.

Kochia is usually managed throughout the growing season. However, Geddes said there are still things producers can do to manage it post-harvest and pre-seeding. For example, farmers who harvested around patches of kochia need to cut those patches as soon as possible.

Kochia can produce upwards of 25,000 seeds per plant and when the stem breaks off in the fall, it turns into a tumbleweed that can spread those seeds far and Charles Geddes

 “Our recent research is beginning to show that kochia seed becomes viable throughout or closer to the end of August. After that you start to see more and more viable seed on the plant, so the earlier you can get in there, the earlier you can cut the plant off and limit the production of viable seed.”

Cutting may not be enough, however.

Kochia is quite resilient and can regrow after harvest under the right environmental conditions, said Geddes. A post-harvest burn-down may be necessary. However, kochia is notoriously herbicide evasive and some populations are resistant to Groups 2, 4 and 9 herbicides.

“Once we see resistance in the Group 4s, that starts to drastically limit the options we have for effective herbicides in small-grain cereal crops like spring wheat,” he said. “But we still need to determine whether Group 4 resistance in kochia covers a single or multiple active ingredients within this site of action.”

There are chemical options available to manage triple-resistant populations. Geddes cites Infinity — a Group 6 and Group 27 combination herbicide — as one example.

The difficulty with Infinity and several other kochia-effective herbicides is they can leave behind residue in the soil, possibly limiting crop options in the following year. This is where longer-term thinking comes in.

“Planning out your rotation in advance can really help you get ahead of these kochia populations,” he said. “You can use these more effective herbicides if you plan to seed a crop next year that is not as sensitive to the residual impact of the herbicide.”

However, chemical solutions are just one part of an overall kochia-killing strategy, said Geddes. Crop competition is another.

“The weak point of the life cycle of kochia is that the seed has very little dormancy and persists only one or two years in the soil seed bank. Planning out your rotation to plant two competitive crops in a row could go a long way towards limiting seed production and eliminating that population.”

Another management practice is to plant winter wheat to compete with kochia. There’s not a lot of research data available in this specific area, said Geddes, but it’s something that “just makes sense.”

“If you seed a winter crop you have an established crop in the spring while kochia is trying to emerge.”

Landowners’ rights in danger of being eroded, says advocate

Energy association wants review process streamlined, which could limit the ability to raise concerns

By Jeff Melchior
Published: October 9, 2019
Alberta Farmer Express

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has been lobbying the Alberta Energy Regulator to “expedite” energy project approvals whenever possible. Photo: iStock

A growing number of abandoned energy leases in Alberta might make farmers wonder if it’s worth allowing an energy company to come onto their land in the first place.

However, a “pro-oil and gas regulatory environment” may make it more difficult to express concern over proposed energy projects, says Daryl Bennett, a director with the Alberta Surface Rights Federation.

According to a document provided by Bennett, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has been lobbying the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to “expedite” energy project approvals whenever possible. The association specifically suggests that the energy regulator be given increased authority to decide which projects are worthy of the full 30-day review window in which the public can voice concerns.

If such “streamlining” was to take place, it could partially or completely bypass landowner and public input, said Bennett.

“Today, when industry wants to come on your land, you can file a statement of concern to the AER and then ask it to address your concerns,” he said. “But industry and government are now looking like they are trying to restrict that play.

“I think last year there were probably 400 statements of concern filed and I think it only resulted in 14 or 15 hearings.”

Bennett said he is also concerned that the provincial government’s environmental policies will give energy companies carte blanche to ignore or minimize their maintenance and reclamation responsibilities.

“Once again it’s the old Conservative party attitude that industry is far more important than the environment,” he said.

Bennett emphasized that he’s not talking about the environment in a “tree hugger” sense but rather landowners’ rights to enjoy their property without being left with a mess.

“Landowners are getting very upset,” he said. “The groups representing landowners and their legal counsel are surprised what this new government is doing. We are very concerned that property rights are going to be trampled so industry can get on doing what it’s always done and create a bigger mess.”

Alberta Energy Regulator’s former CEO grossly mismanaged public funds to create international centre: auditor

Former CEO displayed ‘reckless and wilful disregard’ for the proper management of public funds, report says.

Tony Seskus · CBC News · Posted: Oct 04, 2019 1:03 PM ET | Last Updated: October 4

Jim Ellis, shown in an old promotional photo, grossly mismanaged public funds while president of the Alberta Energy Regulator and the now-defunct International Centre for Regulatory Excellence, according to the Office of the Public Interest Commissioner. (Alberta Energy Regulator)

Alberta’s energy regulator wrongfully used its resources to establish an international centre outside its mandate, while its former CEO displayed “reckless and wilful disregard” for the proper management of public funds, according to investigations by three different provincial government watchdogs.

The damning reports by Alberta’s auditor general, public interest commissioner and ethics commissioner centred on the creation and operation of the now-defunct International Centre for Regulatory Excellence, or ICORE.

The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), which is funded by a levy charged to the energy sector, oversees the province’s massive energy sector and is expected to ensure the safe and environmentally responsible development of the industry.

It established ICORE in 2017 as a separate, external entity that would offer training to regulators around the world.

In findings released Friday, both the auditor general and public interest commissioner found this was outside the AER’s mandate and that public money was spent inappropriately on ICORE activities.

Alberta Ethics Commissioner Marguerite Trussler, left, Public Interest Commissioner Marianne Ryan and Auditor General Doug Wylie, shown at a Friday news conference in Edmonton, shared findings from their respective independent investigations into the activities related to the AER and ICORE. All found the Alberta Energy Regulator wrongfully used its own resources to establish an international centre outside its mandate. (Jason Franson/The Canadian Press)

“AER engaged in activities outside of its mandate and public money was spent inappropriately on ICORE activities,” read the report from Alberta Auditor General Doug Wylie.

He estimated the total financial impact of ICORE activities on the AER totalled $5.4 million, though $3.1 million was recouped. The AER is still out of pocket $2.3 million, according to the audit.

Wylie also concluded that ICORE activities lacked a credible benefit to the AER.

‘Gross mismanagement’ by former CEO

The Office of the Public Interest Commissioner report levelled some of its strongest criticism at Jim Ellis, who was president and CEO of the AER and president of ICORE.

“His actions demonstrated a reckless and wilful disregard for the proper management of public funds, public assets and the delivery of a public service, which … constitutes gross mismanagement,” the report said.

Ethics Commissioner Marguerite Trussler’s report also found that Ellis had a conflict of interest “in that he furthered his own interest and improperly furthered the private interest of three other employees.”

“The primary motivation behind ICORE not-for-profit was to provide future employment for Mr. Ellis and others.”

However, Public Interest Commissioner Marianne Ryan told reporters during a news conference that there was no evidence to suggest Ellis benefited personally from a financial perspective.

The matters did not reach the threshold to refer them to the solicitor general for potential criminal charges, she said.

Ryan added that her report  is not a condemnation of the AER as a whole. “It was employees of the AER that brought this matter to my attention and assisted with the investigation,” she said.

Controls to monitor expenses at first ‘non-existent’

The auditor general’s report also found that controls and processes to protect against potential conflicts of interest failed and that oversight from the AER’s board was ineffective.

Alberta Auditor General Doug Wylie’s report also found that controls and processes to protect against potential conflicts of interest failed and that oversight from the AER’s board was ineffective. (CBC)

“Controls to track and monitor expenses related to ICORE activities were at first non-existent and then poorly implemented,” the report states. “The tone at the top at AER did not support a strong control environment or compliance with policies.”

Wylie’s report said a “culture of fear” at the AER stifled concerns regarding ICORE activities, with a number of staff interviewed by his office saying that employees who expressed complaints felt at risk of losing their jobs.

The culture at the AER stifled concerns regarding ICORE activities, Wylie said. A number of staff interviewed by his office used the phrase a “culture of fear” and said employees who were vocal about expressing complaints were at risk of losing their jobs.

AER sued ICORE in 2019

A recent CBC News investigation found a close and complicated relationship between the AER and ICORE, including the involvement of Ellis.

Several key figures who were involved with ICORE, including Ellis, are no longer associated with either organization. Ellis resigned from his post at the beginning of 2019. Ellis could not immediately be reached for comment Friday.

Also earlier this year, the AER sued ICORE and received a default judgment in its favour for $2.6 million for money it said it was owed for the development and delivery of training materials.

    Alberta Energy Regulator CEO Jim Ellis to resign in January

The results of the provincial investigations come at a time when the energy regulator is under scrutiny from the provincial government.

In September, Energy Minister Sonya Savage announced her department was launching a review of the AER and appointed an interim board of directors to set its future direction.

Savage and Environment Minister Jason Nixon issued a joint statement Friday on the results of the investigations, saying they “cannot condemn the practices noted in these reports strongly enough.”

“Our government was elected on a promise to reform the AER, which is precisely why we have already taken action, launching a review of the AER in August and replaced the board in the same month,” the statement said.

The recommendations contained within these reports will inform the Alberta government’s review of the AER, they said, noting that they expect the agency’s interim board to implement the reports’ recommendations.

Among the recommendations outlined in the three reports:

    Corporate governance throughout Alberta agencies, boards and commissions needs to be strengthened.

    AER staff need to be made aware of and sufficiently trained on the whistleblowing process.

    The AER should evaluate whether any additional funds expended on ICORE activities are recoverable.

In statement, the interim board of the AER said it will take the recommendations seriously and implement any required actions “in order to enhance public confidence” in the regulator.

“While ICORE was originally established to provide training to AER employees and support information-sharing across jurisdictions, it is clear now that a small group of senior leaders used AER resources in a way that is unacceptable,” the regulator said in a statement. “These individuals are no longer employed at the AER.”

AER overhaul a dangerous game

By Lethbridge Herald Opinion
September 11, 2019

Grant Sprague and Bev Yee, Alberta deputy ministers of energy and environment respectively, are very capable senior bureaucrats. Here’s hoping they bring to bear all their skills for the review of the Alberta Energy Regulator.

They should keep in mind that the review ought not to be the witch hunt the current political framing suggests it is.

Increasingly, investors look to ensure they capitalize on energy companies that take seriously those considerations related to environment, social and governance.

That should serve as a reminder not to toss out the baby with the bathwater as the United Conservative Party seeks to erase anything vaguely associated with the thinking of the previous NDP government.

Alberta energy politics are becoming hateful and divisive. And instead of constructively and collectively understanding the complex restructuring with which it must grapple, the industry has become fractious and fragmented. So we find answers to complex issues are distilled down to naively simplistic solutions.

There are elements of the sector that simply adore a bogeyman. There’s plenty to be had if you subscribe to the UCP thesis that everything wrong in energy is someone else’s fault.

The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) is merely the latest culprit the UCP is handing to those in the sector looking for something to hang in effigy.

Want a scapegoat for energy sector travails? The UCP has a closet full ready to trot out: other provinces, other Canadians, foreign interests, liberal politicians.

One key driving force behind the review, suggests Alberta Energy Minister Sonya Savage, is the time it takes to process an application. She points to other jurisdictions like Texas, which she argues processes things exponentially faster.

Implicit in her argument is that this is attractive to investors. To a point it may be, but the minister’s advisers would do well to get in front of her the other side of the Texas story: about investment leaving in droves and about looming environmental debacles, particularly involving water.

One thing increasingly binds investors together: an expectation that companies with which they place capital understand and respond to environment, social and governance imperatives. And they expect solid and robust regulatory frameworks within which firms operate in order to safeguard their capital.

AER is a world-class regulator. In recent times, it has introduced a broad spectrum of improved services designed precisely to solve the very problems of which it has been accused. It has been tackling red-tape challenges for years.

Two recent innovations come to mind: the OneStop process that simplifies applications dramatically and the Integrated Decision Approach, which reflects a long-range understanding of an application.

Regulatory dynamics are a two-way street. Many companies that have hacked staffing in recent years need to assess the quality of their regulatory requests. Remember: garbage in, garbage out.

Good regulators are creatures of the sector and society. So AER ought to mirror regulatory and socio-economic realities.

Has the AER’s staffing grown in recent years?

It has changed, largely in response to the increasingly complex environment in which it’s expected to function – an environment that bears little resemblance to even 15 years ago. For example, when AER was created, it took on the Environmental and Sustainable Resource Development Department functions. Yet its staffing has remained relatively flat for the last several years.

The UCP is desperate to appease certain elements of the industry. But destroying AER’s ability to balance environmental and fiscal imperatives could actually set Alberta’s recovery back dramatically.

Weaken the regulatory framework at your peril. Sloppy regulation begets sloppy industrial operation. And sloppy industrial operation begets sloppy reputation and social unrest. And the kind of capital you want driving the sector loathes sloppy reputations and the risk it brings.

For Sprague and Yee, and the interim board, this will be a delicate task. Deputy ministers must be, of course, political creatures to be effective in their roles. Here’s hoping they help their political masters guide a reasonable and rational review that keeps front and centre a regulator’s role in a robust economy.

And here’s hoping the UCP resists its political impulse to toss people and process under the nearest conveniently rolling bus.

Perhaps most important will be the stakeholder input. It ought to guide the review to stay away from the UCP temptation to bring the AER closer to political will.

Remember the great line from the Joni Mitchell song Big Yellow Taxi: “You don’t know what you got ’til it’s gone.”

Bill Whitelaw is president and CEO at JuneWarren-Nickle’s Energy Group and former publisher of The Lethbridge Herald. Distributed by Troy Media.

Alberta oil and gas producer cleanup cost estimates set too low, coalition says

By Dan Healing
The Canadian Press         

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. chairman Murray Edwards, left, prepares to address the company’s annual meeting in Calgary on May 9, 2019. The Alberta Liabilities Disclosure Project says the province’s largest oil and gas companies are underestimating how much it will cost to clean up thousands of oil and gas wells drilled over past decades.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. chairman Murray Edwards, left, prepares to address the company’s annual meeting in Calgary on May 9, 2019. The Alberta Liabilities Disclosure Project says the province’s largest oil and gas companies are underestimating how much it will cost to clean up thousands of oil and gas wells drilled over past decades.

An Alberta coalition that says oil and gas producers are lowballing how much it will cost to clean up their well sites is being accused by the head of the Alberta Orphan Well Association of overstating those numbers.

The Alberta Liabilities Disclosure Project, a coalition of landowners, environmentalists and others, on Thursday published a list of producer companies with estimates of how much it would cost each to remediate its Alberta oil and gas properties if the job had to be done immediately.

Those costs are much higher than the companies estimates because they are assuming they will have decades of cleanup time, the coalition said, while calling on the province to release independently verified estimates of liabilities.

“When companies report their liabilities at discounted rates, without also reporting what it would cost to do the cleanup today, it makes them look — on paper — healthier than they are,” said Regan Boychuk, the ALDP’s lead researcher.

    “But their numbers assume the companies have decades they may not actually have.”

The cost estimates from the coalition seem much higher than actual costs his organization incurred to clean up 800 inactive oil and gas wells last year, said Lars DePauw, executive director of the OWA, an organization funded by industry that steps in to clean up wells when their owners either can’t or won’t.

“With all the work we did last year, the average cost on the abandonment side, or decommissioning, as we call it, was $34,000 per well and $27,000 to reclaim a site,” he said.

    “I don’t know how they came up with their numbers.”

Boychuk said in an interview his group’s assumed average cleanup cost per well is $229,000, a number based on an internal Alberta Energy Regulator study obtained through freedom of information law.

The numbers given by DePauw may be accurate but they are for cleaning up “cheap, easy, quick wells,” such as shallow gas wells with no associated hazardous gases, he said.

DePauw, in response, said OWA’s job list last year included a mixture of both simple and complex wells, pointing out that the OWA did as many cleanups in one year as it has in the past 20 years.

Cleanup costs were far below targets set by the Alberta Energy Regulator, he said, thanks to growing expertise and the use of area-based programs that allow for greater efficiency.

Calgary-based Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. was singled out by the coalition as facing by far the largest bill at $11.9 billion to clean up 73,000 oil, gas and bitumen wells in Alberta.

In its news release, the coalition adds that is “more than double the $5.3 billion in worldwide asset retirement obligations reported in CNRL’s audited financial statements.”

However, in its Annual Information Form submitted to Canadian regulators in March, CNRL reports its undiscounted worldwide ARO is $12.3 billion.

When asked about that, Boychuk said the coalition worked with a U.S. specialist who consulted American regulatory filings, which didn’t include the undiscounted amount. He said many companies reduce their apparent liability by spreading it out over decades.

He said CNRL should be “applauded” for reporting the undiscounted estimate as many companies do not, but noted the number for all of the company’s assets in Africa, the North Sea and oilsands mining almost matches his group’s estimate for its Alberta wells alone.

Other companies on the coalition’s top 10 list include Husky Energy Inc. (second highest at $2.17 billion), IPC Alberta Ltd., Imperial Oil Ltd., Torxen Energy Ltd., Obsidian Energy Ltd., Cenovus Energy Ltd., Canlin Energy Corp., Paramount Resources Ltd. and Taqa North Ltd.

Husky spokesman Mel Duvall says the company used accepted industry practices to estimate its worldwide abandonment liabilities as of the end of 2018 at $2.4 billion, with the majority of those costs related to properties in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

    “We take our asset retirement obligations seriously and abandon and reclaim in excess of 1,000 wells a year,” he said.

In April, the coalition estimated the total cost to clean up all of Alberta’s oil and gas wells was $40 billion to $70 billion.

In an email, the AER said its official energy cleanup estimate of $58.65 billion is split into $28.35 billion for coal and oilsands mines and $30.2 billion for oil and gas wells, facilities and pipelines.

It says the total security held for mining as of June 2018 is approximately $1.46 billion and the total for oil and gas is about $224 million.

© 2019 The Canadian Press

Limited Partnership Provides Valuable New Revenue for Piikani Nation


News Releases

June 4, 2019

CALGARY, ALBERTA — (Globe Newswire – June 4, 2019) – A recently approved limited partnership provides the Piikani Nation the opportunity to make an equity investment in the transmission infrastructure that crosses their land and delivers a valuable new revenue stream for the First Nation.

“It’s great to see that this Piikani Nation option agreement has finally come to fruition,” said Chief Stanley Grier, Piikani Nation. “In order for AltaLink to build the transmission line, they had to consult the Piikani Nation people, and more importantly our traditional knowledge keepers who were entrusted to verify important sacred traditional and burial sites related to Piikani Nation lands.”

An application from AltaLink and the Piikani Nation (through its nominee) for the new limited partnership – PiikaniLink L.P. – to acquire AltaLink’s transmission assets on the Piikani Nation’s land was approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) on November 13, 2018. The parties completed the commercial arrangements effective June 1, 2019 through the Piikani’s investment of 51 per cent of the equity portion of the transmission line and associated substation equipment acquired from AltaLink.

During consultation for the Southwest 240 kV project, AltaLink worked closely with the Piikani Nation to reach an agreement that allowed the new transmission line to cross First Nation land.

“This partnership is a win-win for the people of the Piikani First Nation and for all Albertans because we were able to save millions of dollars for Alberta electricity ratepayers by building a lower cost project,” said Scott Thon, President and CEO of AltaLink. “At the same time, the Piikani Nation is provided with the opportunity to invest in the transmission line on their land and create a consistent ongoing revenue source for their people for years to come.”

The investment provides the Piikani Nation an opportunity to earn a regulated rate of return while AltaLink will continue to maintain and operate the transmission line as general partner of the PiikaniLink L.P.

“I’m very proud of the partnership we have created with AltaLink, my acknowledgement to all of those that have helped solidify this relationship,” Councilor Doane Crow Shoe said. “Piikani looks forward to the long term benefits alongside AltaLink. It is my hope that this collaboration will improve how Indigenous communities can be a part of the evolving energy sector.”

About the Piikani Nation

The Piikani Nation is a proud member of the Blackfoot Confederacy (Siksikaitsitapi) which consists of Kainai, Siksika and Amskapi Piikani. The Piikani Nation has retained its culture, heritage and language by incorporating Piikanissini, which is the way of life for the Piikani. Piikani sets out its inherent values and principles of the Akaa Piikani, the ancient Piikani people.

Piikani engages in a variety of development functions within their reserve lands and traditional territory. PiikaniLink L.P. is a component of Piikani’s Energy Strategy that will foster future renewable energy for long term economic sustainability and resource development for the Piikani Nation.

About AltaLink

Headquartered in Calgary, with offices in Edmonton, Red Deer and Lethbridge, AltaLink is Alberta’s largest electricity transmission provider. AltaLink is partnering with its customers to provide innovative solutions to meet the province’s demand for reliable and affordable energy. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, AltaLink is part of a global group of companies delivering energy services to customers worldwide.



Media Relations

Tawnya Plain Eagle
Editor, Piikani Nation NewsPiikani Resource Development Ltd.
Phone: 587.777.2845
Email: [email protected]

Media Relations

Robin Boschman
Manager, Corporate Communications
AltaLink Management Ltd.
Phone: 403.267.2166
E-mail: [email protected]  

Renuwell Project

ASRA has been greatly concerned

Action Surface Rights Members,

As you are well aware, ASRA has been greatly concerned with the proliferation of inactive and Orphan Wells over the last couple of years. In fact we intervened at the Supreme Court of Canada in the Redwater affair to make sure that any leftover assets of Bankrupt Operators went to reclaim surface leases first before money went to pay off bank loans.

We have also been concerned about the types of surface leases that landowner have been signing for large Solar and Wind projects as the content of those leases are not regulated and Industry Operators are not currently required to utilize land agents in their dealings with landowners.  Many of those types of surface leases contain clauses highly detrimental to landowners.

ASRA is currently supporting Renuwell Solutions and the MD of Taber as they partner to investigate the potential of putting small scale solar projects on abandoned, or orphaned, surface lease sites.  This feasibility study is funded by a grant from Alberta’s Municipal Climate Change Action Centre (“MCCAC”) and will attempt to navigate the requirements that the Alberta Energy Regulator, the Orphan Well Association, Alberta Environment and the Surface Rights Board may impose on these types of projects.  A template will be developed, which other municipalities can also use, to satisfy the various regulatory agencies requirements and to obtain the needed distribution power company’s approval.

These types of projects will likely benefit landowners by securing annual lease payments by eliminating the requirement  to make annual applications to the SRB, paying some municipal taxes, lowering power costs for irrigation (and possibly reducing electrical distribution and transmission costs as well), preserving agricultural land, providing a more secure power supply, allowing more time to remediate contaminated surface leases and utilizing existing lease access roads, power connections and surface disturbances.  It has been projected that a 2.5 acre solar site could provide enough electricity to run 30 quarter section pivots.
These small solar projects will result in much lower disturbance that large industrial scale projects and we do not think that neighbouring landowners will see any increase in noise and light pollution, weed issues, traffic and dust, fire threats, glare, interruption of farm use of roads, environmental/wildlife problems or reclamational issues.  They will be hooked up to the existing power grid and will not require new transmission lines or substations.

Renuwell and the MD of Taber are hosting a series of Open Houses (see attachment) the last week of May in various communities in the Taber area and we would appreciate it if you could either attend an Open House or respond to this email by detailing any concerns that you might foresee about these types of small solar projects being placed on abandoned, or orphaned, surface leases sites.

Thank you,

Daryl Bennett
Director Action Surface Rights Association 

Farmers call for strong political response to expanding trade obstacles for Canada

By Andy Blatchford
The Canadian Press
April 9, 2019

Canola farmers whose livelihoods have been targeted by China in its feud with Canada say it’s time for the federal government to be aggressive at the political level in its fight against a growing number of agricultural trade barriers around the world.

Several producers told two parliamentary committees Tuesday that China’s recent rejection of Canadian canola-seed shipments is only the latest trade disruption that’s hurt the country’s agriculture sector.

They reminded MPs in Ottawa about a number of major trade obstacles faced by Canadian agricultural exporters in faraway markets like India, Italy, Vietnam and Saudi Arabia.

“Canada can feed the world but not if our government does not act strongly on our behalf, removing non-tariff trade barriers, enforcing existing trade agreements and removing political roadblocks,” Alberta canola farmer Stephen Vandervalk told the House of Commons agriculture committee.

Citing concerns about pests, China has rejected canola-seed imports from Canada and has suspended the licences of two major Canadian exporters.

The moves to cut off the critical Canadian export have been widely viewed as China applying economic pressure on Canada in response to the December arrest of senior Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver at the behest of the United States.

Any extended canola dispute with China, which imported $2.7 billion worth of canola seed from Canada last year, would deliver a painful economic blow to producers, the supply chain and the wider Canadian economy.

The price of canola has fallen since the dispute started last month. The late-winter timing of the disruption has been particularly difficult because it’s forced many farmers to suddenly rethink the planting decisions vital to their businesses.

On Tuesday, producers made it clear to MPs at the committees that even with the urgency around the China conflict, the pain is not only about canola. Canadian farmers, they said, are staring at other big trade hurdles in world markets.

Several of the witnesses mentioned issues that have affected Canada’s durum wheat exports to Italy, wheat sales to Vietnam, pulse exports to India and feed-barley shipments to Saudi Arabia.

Saskatchewan grain farmer Mehgin Reynolds (who is seeking a Conservative party nomination) told MPs that, for instance, her four-year crop rotation includes lentils, barley, canola and durum wheat — all products that face obstacles on foreign markets.

“The frightening reality is that almost every crop being grown in Canada is currently struggling with one trade barrier or another,” Reynolds said.

The Liberal government has insisted it wants to find a scientific solution to the canola dispute, in keeping with China’s insistence that the problem is tainted seeds.

The Liberals have established a working group that includes officials from Richardson International Ltd. and Viterra Inc. — the two exporters that have had their licences to sell canola revoked by China — and representatives from the governments of Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Agriculture Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau has requested to send a delegation of experts to China to examine the issue. She’s said officials are exploring options to support farmers by expanding existing programs.

Canola producer Mark Kaun told the committee it’s time for the Canadian government to start playing “hardball.”

“There’s a pile of imports that come into this country from China — and maybe some of their ships should sit and wait in the water,” Kaun said. “Canadian canola is contaminated — it’s contaminated with political dirt and bureaucracy.”

“This is a political issue plain and simple. Political problems need political solutions,” agreed Vandervalk, who’s also vice-president representing Alberta with the Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association.

“If we must play the game of grain inspections, so be it. But in the meantime Canadian grain farmers are the ones paying the price for the political failings.”