Braid: Future of Alberta PC party looking a lot like its past

By Don Braid, Calgary Herald June 2, 2014

So far, the Progressive Conservative leadership race makes you wonder if anything new will ever happen around here.

Jim Prentice’s core policies, especially on finance, environment and energy, are pretty much Alison Redford’s policies.

His “new” stuff — cracking down on entitlement, etc. — is only what Albertans have deserved all along.

If restoring a 43-year-old government’s lost integrity is the best the PCs can offer, they’re cooked, no matter who wins this race.

Ric McIver, trolling for votes in the party’s deep end, says Archbishop Desmond Tutu is the latest in a string of “celebrities” who blast the industry without knowing what they’re talking about.

Calling Tutu a celebrity is like saying Mozart was a songwriter. The South African anti-apartheid icon — more like a demigod to millions, actually — is one of the most revered humans on the planet.

Tutu’s comment about the oilsands being world-threatening “filth” made Neil Young look like an industry lackey, to be sure.

Even the Fort Chipewyan First Nations chief, who was co-hosting Tutu, seemed uneasy with the archbishop’s cry to shut down the ’sands.

So, really, what was the percentage in an Alberta peanut like McIver taking on a world personality like Tutu? All that does is revive the old bozo image.

The question for these candidates isn’t what political angle they’ll take on the latest attack, but what they’ll do about the fundamental problems — the shattered reputation of the oilsands, and resulting failure to get new pipeline approvals.

The answer appears to be — not much.

Prentice wisely took a milder line on Tutu’s remarks, but his environmental promises have the same look as Redford’s; lots of windy talk about excellence, but not much action.

Prentice makes it absolutely clear what he won’t do, though.

He’ll take no action that doesn’t “harmonize” with measures from Ottawa or the United States. He’ll do nothing that hurts the industry’s competitive position.

Here it is in a nutshell, from the notes for a speech Prentice gave in Medicine Hat last week: “My government will support rigorous and beneficial environmental standards while ensuring the continued responsible expansion of the oilsands and our oil and gas industry.

“We won’t damage the competitiveness of our oil and gas industry by unilaterally imposing costs, carbon charges and regulations.

“Instead, we will work with the federal government and with the U.S. to build a greater advantage by harmonizing our environmental standards.”

That’s exactly what Redford and her ministers said. It amounts to a dreamland promise that Alberta can continue to develop unchecked with no special cost whatever.

But the oilsands industry is a special case. It always has been. For many years, projects were developed with special royalty and tax policies for them alone.

Now that their future might demand a special cost, though, the PC candidates are silent. Nobody wants to disturb Alberta’s sacred cows — the industry and growth.

One premier tried it. Ed Stelmach brought in the $15-per-tonne charge on extra greenhouse gas output by big emitters.

Although that took some courage, many economic experts always felt the levy was too low to be an incentive for change.

But Redford refused to raise the charge, using Ottawa’s foot-dragging and the unique nature of the levy as her excuse. Now the candidates for her job go right along with that.

Prentice’s fiscal line is also completely familiar. He wouldn’t borrow for government operations, but will incur debt for capital works. His savings policy is a bit more aggressive than Redford’s, but that’s the only distinction.

There have been a couple of interesting ideas. Thomas Lukaszuk, lifting one from Wildrose, wants an independent budget officer to oversee spending. Prentice shows more concern for property rights than any PC before him.

For the most part, though, the early race to be premier boils down to this: They’d do the same stuff, but without airplanes.

And Archbishop Tutu’s a celebrity.

Don Braid’s column appears regularly in the Herald

[email protected]

Review of deregulated electricity market now overdue

Delay blamed on MLA’s resignation

By Darcy Henton Calgary Herald May19, 2014

EDMONTON — A plan to educate consumers about the deregulated electricity market and to bolster the powers of the market watchdog is three weeks overdue and likely won’t be submitted to government until June, says the chairman of the committee of six Tory MLAs tasked with the job.

Everett McDonald, PC MLA for Grande Prairie-Smoky, said he now hopes to produce a report on the implementation of 33 recommendations to Energy Minister Diana McQueen June 1.

“Our team is just finishing the report,” McDonald said in an email. “We have one more review and will present to the minister.”

He said he is looking forward to completing the report after 65 meetings with stakeholders and residents

McDonald attributed the delay to the appointment and subsequent departure of an associate minister of electricity, Donna Kennedy-Glans, who resigned over her disenchantment with the party and crossed the floor to sit as an independent.

The committee was assigned May 1, 2013 to provide advice and support to the energy ministry regarding decisions required to implement the 33 recommendations from the blue-ribbon panel’s September 2012 Power For the People report.

It presented an interim report to former energy minister Ken Hughes last fall, but it was never released.

Alberta Energy spokesman Mike Feenstra said the minister is expecting the report soon.

“Our expectation is it will provide a path for us to implement the recommendations we accepted,” he said.

The issue dates back to spiking power prices on the eve of the 2012 election.

Premier Alison Redford diffused a potential election issue on Feb. 23, 2012 by announcing a four-point plan that addressed several growing areas of concerns.

She appointed to blue-ribbon panel of experts to review the variable rate option — the electricity price paid by Albertans who aren’t on fixed contracts — “to reduce volatility and costs.”

She also temporarily froze fees attached to power bills for transmission, distribution and administration charges, called on the Alberta Utilities Commission to find efficiencies with electricity distribution and amended regulations to reduce the deposits required from energy marketers in a bid to increase consumer options.

Since then, four different cabinet ministers have handled the file and electricity prices remain volatile with the regulated rate option jumping 40 per cent from April to May due to plant and transmission line maintenance.

Critics say they aren’t holding out a lot of hope the report will improve the plight of residential consumers.

“They’ve spent a lot of taxpayers dollars to produce a whole bunch of committees and a whole bunch of reports,” said Wildrose critic Joe Anglin. “This is indicative of the fact they don’t know what to do.”

He said report may be late but consumer electricity bills will arrive on time.

“It would not surprise me at all, their having not done anything since the last election … that what they will end up doing here is waiting for the next election and doing something silly again, whatever they have to do to get elected,” Anglin said. “That’s not how you manage a market-based electricity system.”

NDP MLA David Eggen said Albertans are increasingly demanding an explanation for why their electricity bills are so high and he hopes the report will provide some answers.

“We need to have a plan of action to protect Albertans who are right now paying some of the highest monthly rates in North America for residential and commercial power,” he said. “Let’s make it crystal clear why that is, then we can start to solve the problem, because it’s outrageous that we have to pay such high power bills in this province.”

Alberta Consumers Coalition spokesman Jim Wachowich said the plan to create a retail market for electricity in Alberta has been a failure and he is not optimistic a committee of Tory MLAs can fix it.

“This whole process of trying to re-design the utility marketplace has been a very, very flawed process,” he said. “It is our belief that we have just paid a whole lot of money into a conceptual re-design that hasn’t delivered the benefits and probably is not going to deliver benefits that outweigh the costs.”

white

ATCO boss takes aim at regulators, says Albertans power bills are too high

By Amanda Stephenson, Calgary Herald May 14, 2014

Albertans pay more than they should for electricity because the province’s regulatory system is inefficient and cumbersome, said ATCO boss Nancy Southern on Wednesday.

The president and CEO of the Calgary-based company accused regulatory bodies of creating “needless challenges” for industry that end up being reflected on consumers’ power bills. And she told reporters following ATCO’s annual general meeting that she worries about the future, saying federal regulations requiring the phase-out of cheap, coal-fired generation could drive up electricity prices even further.

“There is no ceiling,” Southern said.

Last week, a report by independent think-tank the Fraser Institute ranked Alberta’s electricity prices as among the highest in North America. The report’s authors said the province can’t compete with other jurisdictions that have access to large amounts of hydroelectricity, but also acknowledged that bills here are high because Alberta has a market-based system that means consumers pay the full cost of electricity up front rather than through government subsidies or tax dollars.

But Southern said the report is indicative of a regulatory regime that means it can take years for companies to get a power plant or transmission project approved. Figures provided by ATCO say regulatory costs in Alberta have climbed from $13.5 million in 1998 to $146 million in 2014. (Electricity consumption and generating capacity also increased during that time.)

“It’s created a huge cost burden for all Albertans and what’s the return?” she said. “We’re slowing down our industry because we go through these lengthy processes for permitting and licensing.”

ATCO’s chief operating officer for energy and utilities, Siegfried Kiefer, said the province needs to overhaul electricity regulation the way it did with oil and gas last year when it launched the new Alberta Energy Regulator.

He said there is currently significant overlap between separate bodies like the Alberta Utilities Commission, the Market Surveillance Administration, the Utilities Consumer Advocate, and the Transmission Facilities Cost Monitoring Committee.

“When you allow endless questions, debates on costs that haven’t changed in years and take up hours and hours of time in a hearing room with lawyers, then that (regulatory) process needs to be reviewed,” Kiefer said.

The Herald attempted to contact the Alberta Utilities Commission on Wednesday but was unsuccessful.

Southern also warned that consumers’ electricity bills could spike higher due to federal greenhouse gas regulations that will require up to a dozen of Alberta’s coal-fired power plants — two of which are operated by ATCO — to be shut down out over the next 15 to 20 years. ATCO is revisiting the development of hydro facilities in northern Alberta on the Slave and Athabasca Rivers as a source of long-term reliable green power to replace coal, but Southern said projects like that are expensive and in the meantime electricity demand continues to grow.

“I understand why we’re shutting them (the coal plants) down and I agree we have to be careful of our environment,” she said. “But I also get very concerned that we have a wonderful asset base in Alberta that is going to be thrown out with the bathwater . . . And all of us today are not going to be able to enjoy that low-cost benefit that we have today and have paid for.”

Also on Wednesday, ATCO announced the launch of a new division that will sell power directly to commercial and industrial customers in Alberta.

The company will offer customers such as hospitals, shopping malls, light industry, and large industrial operations electricity solutions for their business.

[email protected]

white

Alberta pork producers bullish about the future

By Mabell, Dave on May 29, 2014.

LETHBRIDGE HERALD

[email protected]

For Alberta’s pork producers, there’s a little more gravy on the plate.

After several lean years, industry officials report demand and prices are on the rise. And so far, Alberta’s farms remain free of a new disease that’s affected many producers in the U.S.

“There’s really a high demand for protein products globally,” explains Darcy Fitzgerald, executive director for Alberta Pork.

And Canada remains one of just a handful of nations that’s still exporting food products to countries around the world.

“We currently ship about 70 per cent of all our food products outside of Canada,” he said, as southern Alberta producers gathered for an annual get-together in Lethbridge.

Specialty pork cuts processed in Lethbridge are shipped to Japan, he pointed out. Live hogs from Alberta may be trucked to Oregon or Iowa, as well as to plants in this province, British Columbia or Saskatchewan.

“It has a significantly higher value now, over the last six months,” he said. For producers, Fitzgerald said it means an opportunity to recoup losses, when hogs were selling at an estimated loss of $40 to $50 each.

Hard times have cut seriously into the number of Alberta producers, Fitzgerald added.

“In the 1960s, we had about 26,000 producers in Alberta.”

A decade ago, he said, that number was down to about 1,200.

“Now we have 380 in Alberta,” almost one-half of them within driving distance of Lethbridge.

And some, in typical Alberta style, raise both hogs and cattle.

In his report to southern producers, Fitzgerald outlines precautions being taken to ward off the virus that’s hit some American producers. Strict “bio-security” steps are being taken to keep Alberta’s industry healthy.

Alberta Pork is also focussing on promotional events, including a new “Passion for Pork” campaign. It’s recently sponsored a Kansas City-style barbecue festival in Calgary, he said, with one to follow in Edmonton.

“Our pork is well sought after,” he said.

Fitzgerald said pulled barbecue pork is increasingly in demand. It’s a treat anyone can create in their slow cooker.

“Now we’re seeing it in sandwiches and on pizza.”

white

McIver admits mistakes, but promises to do better as premier

By Darcy Henton, Calgary Herald

May 29, 2014 11:58 AM

EDMONTON — Progressive Conservative leadership candidate Ric McIver says he made some mistakes when serving in Alison Redford’s cabinet, but will rectify them if he wins the premier’s job.

Borrowing a page from populist premier Ralph Klein, the former infrastructure and transportation minister noted he cut funding to two infrastructure programs during a period of fiscal restraint following the 2012 election.

But speaking Wednesday in Edmonton, the former Calgary alderman said he will make it a priority to restore millions of dollars chopped from sewage and water treatment programs and bridge, airport and resource road programs if he wins the September Tory leadership vote.

McIver also distanced himself from former premier Redford and the so-called sky palace controversy by vowing to only have one office in the capital city if he wins the top job.

But McIver told about 25 seniors at a downtown Edmonton seniors residence he wasn’t perfect.

“I’m very proud of my record in government, but I have made mistakes,” he said.

McIver owned up to slashing a strategic transportation infrastructure program, a water and wastewater partnership, and the Water for Life initiative during the 2012 budget crunch that he said should now be reinstated.

He said the cuts chopped $135 million to $195 million from the budget.

“We took that money out of the budget at a time when revenues fell short of what we expected, but not putting it back is a mistake that needs to be fixed,” he said.

McIver, one of three declared candidates in the PC leadership contest, promised to restore the programs before the next provincial election.

The MLA for Calgary-Hays said it was also a mistake to force seniors to submit to a computer program to test their driving ability when many are unfamiliar with computer technology.

He vowed to eliminate a testing program called Driveable and to review the use of another exam known as the Simard-MD system.

While safety on Alberta highways will remain a paramount concern, McIver said there are other methods of testing driver fitness and competence.

Ruth Adria of the Elder Advocates of Alberta Society applauded McIver for his commitment to eliminate the Driveable testing protocol.

Adria said requiring seniors over 75 to take the $250 test, which is provided through a private company, is unfair.

“There’s anguish across the province — an agony of seniors losing their licenses,” she said.

Following his speech, McIver told reporters he was committed to releasing the names of his campaign donors before the first vote in September “because transparency and accountability has to be more than lip service.”

Independent pollster and political analyst Janet Brown said McIver is positioning himself as the candidate who will “prove the Redford days are over” and the Tories have learned from past mistakes.

“He’s clearly trying to paint himself as the person who is going to sort of rectify the sins of the last government,” Brown said.

“Everyone is sort of treating Redford and the Redford years as the elephant in the room. It seems like he’s prepared to really address that head on — and not pretend it wasn’t as bad as it was.”

With files from Chris Varcoe, Calgary Herald

[email protected]

Original source article: McIver admits mistakes, but promises to do better as premier

white

 

Alberta Conservative leadership candidate Jim Prentice promises to cap debt

By Karen Kleiss, Edmonton Journal

Power companies want to choose fuel sources

By Sheila Pratt, Edmonton Journal

May 28, 2014
EDMONTON – Alberta’s big power companies say they are already reducing their carbon emissions by shifting to cleaner natural gas and are adamantly opposed to any policies that encourage specific renewable technologies.

“We believe in the need to reduce emissions but in a manner consistent with market,” said Evan Bahry of the Independent Power Producers Society of Alberta, which includes big players like Capital Power, TransAlta and Shell.

Bahry was responding to a new report that says Alberta could cut its carbon emissions almost by half and improve its international reputation by shutting down its 19 coal-fired electricity plants. They produce almost as much greenhouse gases as the oilsands.

But the transition over 20 years to a mix of renewables including wind, solar, and some natural gas would require government policy tools to kick-start the renewable industry says the report written jointly by the Pembina Institute and Clean Energy Canada, a Vancouver based think-tank working for a low-carbon future.

Wildrose MLA Joe Anglin says the phase-out of coal would be possible if hydro power is added to Alberta’s mix of electricity production.

“The people who are making money off coal won’t give it up,” said Anglin.

“But there’s another factor here — if we don’t improve our environmental record, we won’t get access to international markets for our bitumen and we won’t grow,” said Anglin.

“And we can’t just keep making up statements about our great environmental record when the facts don’t back it up.”

Alberta is the only province without a renewable energy strategy. The provincial government has promised to release one this year.

The province’s big electricity companies in IPPSA are opposed to “any policy tool to force promotion of one type of fuel source over another,” Bahry stressed.

Already some old coal plants are being replaced with three natural gas plants in the Edmonton area as the industry responds to market signals of abundant cheap natural gas, he said.

Wind power is not economically viable in this market, he said.

Marlo Raynolds, vice-president of BluEarth Renewables, which operates wind farms, disagreed.

Wind provides the cheapest power to consumers because there is no ongoing fuel costs — that’s why existing power plants don’t like it, he said.

“When wind power goes on the grid, the pool price goes down and it goes down for everyone, coal and gas,” said Raynolds.

“We can’t compete because it’s not in their best interest to have power with zero-cost fuel in the mix.”

What the wind industry needs is long-term power purchase agreements from a big customer to raise capital for construction.

Raynolds says he has suggested a more generic tool to encourage renewables.

Government could put a limit on greenhouse gas emissions from all conventional power plants. Those companies could then choose how to meet the limit by building wind, solar or gas, he said.

Ontario closed its last coal plant this year.

Bahry warned in his release that climate-change policies done poorly could deter investment in new plants and raise costs to consumers.

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal

Original source article: Power companies want to choose fuel sources

white

PC candidates take aim at recent Tory policies

By James Wood And Chris Varcoe, Calgary Herald May 26, 2014

Tory leadership candidates attempted to regain ground from the opposition on key policy issues and reconnect with the party grassroots Monday in the race to become Alberta’s next premier.

Former Calgary alderman Ric McIver delivered his leadership nomination papers to the Progressive Conservative party, while former federal cabinet minister Jim Prentice and Edmonton MLA Thomas Lukaszuk both offered up positions distancing them from recent Tory policies.

In a speech in Medicine Hat, Prentice said successive PC governments have “been less than careful about the protection of our property rights in this province.”

Taking aim at concerns that arose under former premier Ed Stelmach, Prentice promised that if he becomes premier, he would introduce a bill affirming the rights of property owners in cases where their land is taken for public purposes.

“That will make it abundantly clear that people have not been deprived of their property rights,” Prentice, a lawyer who specialized in property rights issues before becoming the MP for Calgary Centre-North, said in an interview.

“People are entitled both to be heard and to be fairly compensated.”

Prentice also said the new Alberta Energy Regulator — created under former premier Alison Redford — is not yet meeting the needs of either the energy industry or landowners.

The former federal environment minister said he would ensure farmers and ranchers directly and adversely affected by adjoining energy operations will have legal standing at hearings.

Keith Wilson, an Edmonton lawyer who has battled the Tory government over land rights issues for years, said he was “surprised and encouraged” by Prentice’s detailed promise to deal with the intervener issue, but believes a law affirming property rights doesn’t go far enough.

Redford resigned in March amid growing controversies over her travel bills and spending of taxpayers money, triggering the PC leadership contest.

Lukaszuk — who resigned as jobs minister last week to run for leader — called for additional oversight of the premier’s office by creating a separate legislative officer in charge of reviewing all government finances, mirroring an oversight position in Ottawa.

“Having a form of scrutiny over the expenditures and the budgetary processes, particularly some of the offices such as the premier’s office, would give Albertans a peace of mind. This is a bit of a sad situation, because actually historically … we never needed to put any measures in place,” said Lukaszuk.

Just days before Redford’s resignation, the government defeated a Wildrose private member’s bill that would have created an independent budget officer.

But Lukaszuk — who has hit Medicine Hat, Lethbridge and Calgary since Sunday — said he would also empower backbench MLAs and opposition members by beefing up all-party legislative committees to take on roles such as vetting all new legislation.

He intends to file his candidacy before the party’s May 30 deadline, while Prentice is already the first official candidate in the contest, which culminates in a September vote of party members.

McIver, who will become the second candidate in the race once he’s registered with Elections Alberta, said his recent travels gave him a chance to hear varying concerns on a regional basis — including 24-hour health care in Cold Lake, land use in Medicine Hat and the fate of the Michener Centre in Red Deer.

He said his platform will be developed in a similar fashion.

“You’re going to see me go out, talk to Albertans, listen to them, find out what’s important and then you’re going to see me unveil policies on the key issues,” said the former infrastructure minister.

“If I do my job well, they’ll decide I’m the right person to lead.”

[email protected]

Write-down of two-thirds of US shale oil explodes fracking myth

The Guardian
Industry’s over-inflated reserve estimates are unravelling, and with it the ‘American dream’ of oil independence

Next month, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) will publish a new estimate of US shale deposits set to deal a death-blow to industry hype about a new golden era of US energy independence by fracking unconventional oil and gas.

EIA officials told the Los Angeles Times that previous estimates of recoverable oil in the Monterey shale reserves in California of about 15.4 billion barrels were vastly overstated. The revised estimate, they said, will slash this amount by 96% to a puny 600 million barrels of oil.

The Monterey formation, previously believed to contain more than double the amount of oil estimated at the Bakken shale in North Dakota, and five times larger than the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas, was slated to add up to 2.8 million jobs by 2020 and boost government tax revenues by $24.6 billion a year.

Industry lobbyists have for long highlighted the Monterey shale reserves as the big game-changer for US oil and gas production. Nick Grealy, who runs the consultancy No Hot Air which is funded by “gas and associated companies”, and includes the UK’s most high-profile shale gas fracker Cuadrilla among its clients, predicted last year that:

“… the star of the North American show is barely on most people’s radar screens. California shale will… reinvigorate the Golden State’s economy over the next two to three years.”

This sort of hype triggered “a speculation boom among oil companies” according to the LA Times. The EIA’s original survey for the US Department of Energy published in 2011 had been contracted out to Intek Inc. That report found that the Monterey shale constituted “64 percent of the total shale oil resources” in the US.

The EIA’s revised estimate was based partly on analysis of actual output from wells where new fracking techniques had been applied. According to EIA petroleum analyst John Staub:

“From the information we’ve been able to gather, we’ve not seen evidence that oil extraction in this area is very productive using techniques like fracking… Our oil production estimates combined with a dearth of knowledge about geological differences among the oil fields led to erroneous predictions and estimates.”

The Intek Inc study for the EIA had relied largely on oil industry claims, rather than proper data. Hitesh Mohan, who authored the Intek study for the EIA, reportedly conceded that “his figures were derived from technical reports and presentations from oil companies, including Occidental Petroleum, which owns the lion’s share of oil leases in the Monterey Shale, at 1.6 million acres.” Mohan had even lifted his original estimate for the EIA to 17 billion barrels.

Geoscientist David Hughes, who worked for the Geological Survey of Canada for 32 years, said:

“The oil had always been a statistical fantasy. Left out of all the hoopla was the fact that the EIA’s estimate was little more than a back-of-the-envelope calculation.”

Last year, the Post Carbon Institute (PCI) published Hughes’ study, Drilling California: A Reality Check on the Monterey Shale, which conducted an empirical analysis of oil production data using a widely used industry database also relied on by the EIA. The report concluded that the original EIA estimate was “highly overstated,” and unlikely to lead to a “statewide economic boom…. California should consider its economic and energy future in the absence of an oil production boom.”

A spokesman for the Institute, Tod Brilliant, told me:

“Given the incredible difference between initial projections of 15 billion barrels and revisions to 600 million, does this not call into account all such global projections for tight oil?”

As I’d reported earlier in June last year, a wider PCI study by Hughes had come to similar conclusions about bullish estimates of US shale oil and gas potential, concluding that “light tight oil production in the USA will peak between 2015 and 2017, followed by a steep decline”, while shale gas production would likely peak next year. In that post, I’d pointed out previous well-documented, and alarmingly common, cases of industry over-estimates of reserve sizes which later had been questioned.

Analysts like Jeremy Leggett have said, citing exaggerated oil industry estimates, that if reserve and production reality are indeed significantly lower than industry forecasts, we could be at risk of an oil shock as early as within the next five years.

The latest revelations follow a spate of bad news for industry reassurances about the fracking boom. New research published this month has found that measured methane leaks from fracking operations were three times larger than forecasted. The US Environment Protection Agency therefore “significantly underestimates” methane emissions from fracking, by as much as a 100 to a 1,000 times according to a new Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences study published in April.

The Associated Press also reported, citing a Government Accountability Office investigation, that the US Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management had failed to adequately inspect thousands of oil and gas wells that are potentially high risk for water and environmental damage.

Despite the mounting evidence that the shale gas boom is heading for a bust, both economically and environmentally, both governments and industry are together pouring their eggs into a rather flimsy basket.

According to a secret trade memo obtained by the Huffington Post, the Obama administration and the European Union are pushing ahead with efforts to “expand US fracking, offshore oil drilling and natural gas exploration”, as well as exports to the EU, under the prospective Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement.

Dr. Nafeez Ahmed is an international security journalist and academic. He is the author of A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It, and the forthcoming science fiction thriller, Zero Point. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter @nafeezahmed.

white

AltaLink’s transition to Berkshire Hathaway Energy will be ‘seamless,’ official says