This job is for the birds

The Pincher Creek Voice

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Toni Lucas

“Our field guys are amazing at what they do, and they love it,” said AltaLink Communications Advisor Shawn Roth. We contacted him after two citizens sent in pictures of helicopters flying close to the towers in the Summerview area near the Oldman River Dam over the past 3 days. Crews were also working on the Fidler Substation and Transmission Line project, where construction is expected to be completed this summer.

“It’s pretty neat to see what the field crew guys actually do,” said Roth, explaining that the helicopter crew was installing bird flight diverters. “That’s the yellow coil you can see in the pictures. The one you can see in that picture is a little larger than the typical bird flight diverters. The purpose of the bird flight diverters is to increases the visibility of the overhead shield wire, making it easier for the bird to see and maneuver around. The overhead shield wire is typically where we see bird collisions.” This line has no electricity going through it and is used to protect the system from lightning strikes. Roth explained that this line is thinner and less visible to the birds, and strung from the top of the structure. The diverters are being placed at about every 10 metres.

Roth explained about some of there environmental initiatives. “We have an avian protection program. We have nesting programs for birds, we relocate nests if we think they’re in an unsafe place, and these bird diverters are part of our avian protection plan. We have a thing called greenjacket which is really cool. Greenjacket is basically on new substations.” These are covers that prevent the possibility of electrocution. “We want to make our system as safe as we possibly can, for everybody.”
To find out more about the AltaLink aviation protection plans click here.

white

TransAlta profitted $16 million in alleged market manipulation: watchdog

 By Darcy Henton, Calgary Herald March 26, 2014 12:06 PM

EDMONTON — Damages stemming from alleged electricity market manipulation by TransAlta Corp. could exceed $100 million, according to new documents filed with the Alberta Utilities Commission.

Alberta’s electricity watchdog, the Market Surveillance Administrator, claims a TransAlta strategy to drive up power prices cost electricity consumers and other utilities tens of millions of dollars while TransAlta reaped $16 million in profits.

“The MSA does not have a precise estimate on exposure to pool price and instead has shown harm relative to different proportions of total consumption of electric energy from the Alberta grid,” say new documents filed with the AUC.

The MSA charted an impact ranging from $40 million to $160 million, and that doesn’t include the impact on the forward power market.

The watchdog filed allegations of anti-competitive behaviour against Alberta’s largest utility last month, accusing it of staging discretionary shutdowns at six power plants during peak demand periods over 11 days in 2010 and 2011.

The supper-hour shutdowns on cold winter nights increased electricity prices by 10 to 60 per cent, and forced the companies that owned the rights to the power to scramble to purchase high-priced electricity for their customers, according to MSA filings. The shutdowns in 2011 triggered an emergency alert over the short supply of power.

Excerpt from MSA application, pages 6-7:

 

TransAlta and two of its electricity traders have denied any wrongdoing and have filed complaints about the MSA’s handling of the investigation with the Alberta Utilities Commission.

“To be clear, we do not agree with the findings of the MSA, including the conclusions that there was market harm, and we will challenge those conclusions at the hearing,” TransAlta spokeswoman Marcy McAuley said in an email.

She said TransAlta will address all of the filings and related documents, “including those demonstrating that the MSA permitted the actions taken by TransAlta.”

The AUC is considering whether to hear the complaints against the MSA separately or together with the allegations against TransAlta.

If the price hiking allegations are upheld by the AUC, TransAlta could be fined up to $1 million per day and be required to reimburse consumers and affected utilities for their costs. It may also have to pay the cost of the lengthy investigation.

Edmonton-based Capital Power says the shutdowns cost it nearly $10 million alone. In Calgary, Enmax says it also experienced financial losses but didn’t specify an amount in documents filed to the AUC.

The electricity watchdog is also asking the AUC to consider TransAlta’s failure to immediately provide critical documents it sought in the investigation and to also take into account the allegation that the utility lost or deleted key computer hard drives.

The estimates of financial harm were included in updated allegations the MSA filed against TransAlta on Friday.

“This is essentially what we say is the evidence in support of our allegations of market manipulation,” said MSA president Harry Chandler.

In the 125-page document, the MSA says TransAlta’s complaints about its investigation are a delay tactic and the utility’s argument that its activities were permitted under market rules has no merit.

While power producers can in certain circumstances withhold their own power to increase the price — a strategy known as economic withholding — TransAlta had no right to withdraw power it was committed to supply to Enmax and Capital Power, the MSA claims in its filings.

“TransAlta has no right and can claim no right to deal with committed capacity as if it was its own property,” the MSA contends in the documents.

The MSA alleges in its filings that TransAlta manipulated the price of electric energy in Alberta by removing the committed capacity of its competitors at coal-fired generating units during tight supply periods.

“The purpose and effect of this strategy was to move prices higher in the power pool and to create uncertainty that would drive prices higher for forward contracts for electric energy,” the MSA states in its filings.

“The strategy was uncompetitive in that it relied upon removing significant amounts of its competitors’ committed capacity from the available supply of electricity.”

The MSA said the normal practice in the industry is to implement discretionary shutdowns during off-peak hours, usually on weekends.

But the MSA alleges TransAlta drafted a strategy on Oct. 21, 2010, that was approved by its senior vice-presidents, to time discretionary shutdowns to maximize profits.

In documents filed with the AUC, it quotes a TransAlta internal memo explaining the strategy with the following example: “Two units are down in the province and one of our units develops a leak. We take the unit down immediately instead of scheduling the unit off for the upcoming weekend.”

The memo adds: “Previously, we have shied away from setting price during tight situations because of the ‘optics’ of this.”

MSA Report on TransAlta

[email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald
white

Innisfail objecting to AltaLink preferred route

Alberta Utilities Commission hearings are on in Red Deer into AltaLink’s plans

Tuesday, Mar 18, 2014 06:00 am | BY TIM LASIUTA
bilde
Transmission tower on Cottonwood Road near Rge. Rd. 25 awaits final commisioning on a recent sunny day. AltaLink hearings are taking place in Red Deer to determine the final route of the proposed towers.

The Town of Innisfail is objecting to AltaLink’s controversial preferred route through Central Alberta and has sent a senior staff member to make a presentation at the Alberta Utilities Commission hearing in Red Deer.

On March 17, Craig Teal, the town’s director of planning and operational services, testified in front of the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) hearing at the Holiday Inn South in Gasoline Alley in objection to the proposed 80L route through the southwest end of Innisfail near Highway 54.

“The Town of Innisfail does not support the preferred route as put forth by AltaLink,” said Teal. “Our preference is a line northeast of Innisfail for a variety of reasons we feel make good sense.”

Teal said there is a pre-existing condition that dates back to the 1950s to give 80L right-of-way in the Innisfail area so they do not dispute that.

“We object to the route in the south end of town as transmission lines are not attractive, and we want to ensure we are able to attract investment and interest from businesses,” said Teal. “There is also the issue of the land the proposed corridor will take.

“Transmission line land competes with residential development,” he added. “In terms of land values, can land near a power line be valued the same as land without such a structure? For the town, that would mean lower tax revenues which would hit our bottom line.”

Additionally, the town would have to take care of the green space beneath the lines and that would take up taxpayers’ money for an asset Innisfailians do not gain any revenue from, said Teal.

“The northeast route is planned to be industrial so any transmission lines would not have as much visual impact as on a residential area,” said Teal. “As the industrial area is still in the planning stages we could build around 80L and be more proactive.”

Officials from AltaLink are ready to work with whatever option the AUC would recommend, said Peter Brodsky, AltaLink manager of external communications.

“We respect Innisfail’s preference for 80L,” said Brodsky. “The difference is one kilometre over either route.”

The Wachter Group of Innisfail was also scheduled to present before the AUC on Monday morning. Hearings began on March 11 and will continue until March 21 tentatively.

white

Alberta Premier Alison Redford resigns

By  Global News

EDMONTON – Alison Redford, the premier of Alberta, announced Wednesday evening that she is resigning effective Sunday evening.

“I’ve given my heart and my soul to this province every single minute of the day for the last two and a half years,” said Redford.

“Quite simply, I am not prepared to allow party and caucus infighting to get in the way of building a better future for our province and for all Albertans.”

“That is why I am announcing today that – with profound optimism for Alberta’s future – I am resigning as premier of Alberta effective this Sunday evening.”

“Most importantly, to the people of Alberta, thank you for giving me the incredible opportunity to serve in the greatest job in this province,” Redford added, which caused the large crowd gathered inside the Legislature to applaud.

“On election night two years ago, I pledged that we would govern with unity and build prosperity. Well, at least we got the prosperity right.”

MLAs and staff received an email asking them to go to the rotunda at 6 p.m.

Redford spent hours meeting with Deputy Premier Dave Hancock on Wednesday.

She did not take questions from the media following her address.

A spokesperson from her office confirms Redford will stay on as MLA for Calgary-Elbow.

“For the second time in three years, the premier of Alberta has resigned, and for the third time in eight years, the PC party will be looking for a new leader,” said Wildrose leader Danielle Smith.

“Premier Alison Redford was elected to lead the PC party as an outsider, she wasn’t part of the old boys club. She was hailed as a new kind of leader who could fix what was wrong with their party and government,” she added.

“I have no doubt that she intended to be that leader. I have no doubt that Albertans had high hopes that she would be that leader. But what we’ve witnessed during her short 29 months as premier is the clearest indication yet that the PC party simply can’t be fixed,” said Smith.

“The problems with their party and their government run far too deep for one leader to change.”

 

 “It almost seemed like death by a thousand cuts,” said NDP leader Brian Mason following Wednesday night’s resignation announcement.

“I guess I didn’t see it coming quite as quickly, but I guess I concluded a while back that it might be inevitable.”

“It really has to do more with the Conservative caucus and party and the fact that they’re doing so poorly in public opinion polls and the premier’s popularity ratings were so low, and I really think that moved it,” Mason added.

Liberal leader Raj Sherman thanked Redford and her family for their service.

“Premier Redford wasn’t the major problem here. The major problem is the PC government,” he said.

“It is a tired, old government that has caused many of the problems that Albertans face today.”

“The health care access crisis has been around for more than a decade. The education crisis, the lack of schools – they should have been built years ago,” Sherman said. “This is the hallmark of a PC government that needs to be removed next election.”

“They’re leaderless now, they have no leader. This is all PC infighting in between – half who wanted the leader, half who don’t. And that’s why there’s no sense of direction in the PC government.”

Redford’s announcement came just one hour before the presidents of PC constituency associations in Calgary and Edmonton were due to meet to vote on whether to ask Redford to resign, sources told Global News.

READ MORE: Voter support continues to slide for Alberta conservatives: poll 

Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office issued a statement Wednesday night:

“We thank Premier Redford for her years of service and her commitment to the people of Alberta and to Canada, and we wish her the best in whatever comes next.”

Edmonton Mayor Don Iveson used social media to share his thanks.

Redford was Alberta’s 14th premier and the first woman to hold the position.

white

Seven stumbles and a funeral: Why Alberta’s Premier Alison Redford had to quit

Josh Wingrove

The Globe and Mail

Published

Last updated

There was no one thing. Alison Redford, so frequently a premier on borrowed time, succumbed Wednesday when she resigned her leadership of Alberta’s dynasty PC party. But there were signposts along the road as she gradually lost the support of the public and her party.

1. The outsider

Ms. Redford was an outsider from the start, with only one MLA supporting her leadership bid. She made the second ballot largely by signing up outsiders with a string of campaign promises – chiefly to reverse a $107-million education cut, which wooed teachers but angered many in the party. She beat the caucus’s preferred candidate, Gary Mar, with the same outsider support and, six months later, won an election in which the Wildrose Party made serious errors in the final week. She struggled to satisfy both the centrist, non-partisan coalition that handed her power, and the party she led.

2. Trouble on the left, unrest on the right

A pair of anti-union bills passed in December sparked protests and led union leaders, who earlier were favourable, to dismiss her as a fraud. Earlier in the year, her government also changed the way it budgeted, separating out capital spending. The move was explained as being more in line with common accounting principles, but fiscal hawks said it amounted to cooking the books.

3. The Mandela funeral

The catalyst for much of the furor is a $45,000 trip to South Africa for Ms. Redford and an aide to attend Nelson Mandela’s funeral. The costs were high because she took a government plane to meet up with Stephen Harper’s own plane, flew her aide separately and then flew back early, rather than travelling with Mr. Harper. A week ago, she apologized and said she paid back the $45,000.

4. Expenses and ethics under scrutiny

Ms. Redford had introduced what she billed as the country’s most robust expense disclosure rules. But her own expenses came under greater scrutiny after the South Africa trip. She was slammed for booking first-class flights and luxurious hotels. She flew her daughter and her daughter’s friend on the government plane, which was also used for trips timed closely to party events – and to pick Ms. Redford up in California before Ralph Klein’s funeral. Ms. Redford was also critized when a lucrative tobacco lawsuit contract went to the law-firm of her ex-husband.

5. An uprising in caucus

Last Thursday, MLA Len Webber broke publicly with his leader, resigning from caucus and telling a news conference she was a bully and that anybody would be better as leader. Ms. Redford’s allies attacked, saying he was “a very sad man” who should “go back to being an electrician.” That further divided caucus. One well-regarded MLA, former energy executive Donna Kennedy-Glans, followed suit Monday, resigning from caucus and cabinet. Other MLAs were openly discussing doing the same.

6. The isolated leader

Ms. Redford struggled to establish a personal connection with voters and even most members of her own caucus. When Ms. Kennedy-Glans left, she said she had spoken one-on-one with the premier just once since being elected, even though the two are from the same party, their ridings are both in Calgary and Ms. Kennedy-Glans held a junior cabinet post. There were other signs: Ms. Redford replaced government sedans with black SUVs and brought in top staff from Ontario or from outside politics. Seen to be freezing out caucus, she had few friends when things went sour.

7. No rescue party

In the last election, Ms. Redford fought off a challenge from the nascent Wildrose Party but the polls showed support flowing back to the opposition. In the election, business interests – or money, at least – rallied to the PCs. But as Redford’s troubles accumulated there was little support from leaders in the oil patch, out of the oil patch. As Jeff Jones reports, industry leaders shrugged at her crisis because they see little difference in how either the PCs or Wildrose would affect them

8. Polling problems and the knife at the throat

After months of decline, public opinion poll numbers placed Ms. Redford and her Tories at terrifying depths, with a personal approval rating of 18 per cent and party support of just 19 per cent, versus 46 per cent for Wildrose. With the party’s 43-year dynasty at risk, riding association presidents were preparing non-confidence motions in meetings set for Wednesday night, which were pre-empted by Ms. Redford’s departure.
white

Redford should quit playing the ‘mommy’ card

By Letter to the Editor on March 18, 2014.

Alison Redford needs to resign immediately to be a stay-at-home mom. Albertans don’t need or want any politician who plays the “mommy” card (or “daddy” card, for that matter) as an excuse for giving themselves yet more perks on the backs of the taxpayer.

What nerve for politicians to think they are entitled to give themselves whatever they want because of the job requirements. If they find those requirements that much of a burden, they should quit and find other employment, like anyone else in the workforce who is dissatisfied with their job does.

The sad reality is that no one goes into politics with a view of “public service;” rather, they go into it with a view of “self service.” And, it’s prevalent in all levels of government, be it local, provincial or federal. What other group gives themselves raises, huge pensions and a myriad of other perks as selfish and self-serving as these individuals? At a time when most Albertans are struggling to pay exorbitant taxes and excessive utility bills, it is unconscionable for these so-called public servants to be “feathering their nests” at taxpayers’ expense. They should be ashamed of themselves.

And, thanks to Ms. Redford, I will no longer consider supporting, for any level of government, any woman who has children under 18. Apparently, it is too great an encumbrance for them. Amazing though, isn’t it, how thousands of other working women manage to juggle motherhood and jobs, with a lot less money and no perks?

Diane Hall

Lethbridge

white

Increased chlorination to continue

March 18, 2014.

Dave Mabell

LETHBRIDGE HERALD

[email protected]

With ice thawing along the Oldman River, city residents will have to put up with poor-tasting water.

But Lethbridge water remains clean and safe to drink, city council was assured Monday.

Doug Hawkins, the city’s manager of infrastructure services, reported officials are receiving complaints about the odour and less-than-ideal taste of the city’s water currently, in the wake of a boil-water order last week.

“Turbidity levels and the amount of suspended solids remains high,” he told council.

“And the ice is breaking up now,” adding to the situation.

“It’s a continuing challenge,” he said. “The plant is operating normally,” Hawkins added.

Though last week’s challenges forced the plant’s temporary shutdown, he said conditions now are what’s usually expected in March. As in previous years, part of the city’s response is to increase the level of chlorination in the system as a safeguard.

“That’s normal,” and could continue for several more days.

Mayor Chris Spearman joined council members in thanking Hawkins, water and wastewater manager Doug Kaupp and their staff for their work in overcoming the city’s brief water crisis.

“They were the heroes during the water shortage.”

The mayor also praised the efforts of Fire Chief Brian Cornforth, who doubles as the city’s emergency response director.

City residents should also be thanked for conserving the water supply as requested, Councillor Ryan Parker said.

Spearman told council city officials consider the consequences when they ask businesses and citizens o reduce their water consumption significantly.

“We don’t issue a state of emergency order lightly,” he said.

Nor does Alberta Health Services when it issues a boil-water warning, the mayor added.

As of Monday, however, residents of the Vista Meadows residential development west of the city – along with customers of the Lethbridge North County Potable Water Co-op and the County of Lethbridge Rural Water Association Co-op – remained under a boil-water order from AHS.

Officials said there was a possibility of contamination from the depressurization of co-op lines during the regional water emergency. It could take several days for the systems to be flushed and deemed potable, they said earlier.

white

 

When Will PC Government Listen to Albertans and Stop Allowing Risky Drilling in Urban Areas?

NDP

Question Period: March 17, 2014

Click here to see the Video

Mr. Bilous: Mr. Speaker, for years Albertans have watched this PC government bend over backwards to help industry make huge profits at the expense of the environment and community safety. Today 11,000 citizens of Lethbridge, just to name one city, delivered a petition calling on this government to help protect their homes, schools, playgrounds from harmful drilling. To the Minister of Municipal Affairs: when will you listen to the people of Alberta and their municipal leaders and stop allowing risky drilling in urban areas?

Mrs. McQueen: Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thank you to the member for the question. I want to say that we’ve been listening very, very carefully to our two MLAs from the area, to the mayor of the community as well, making sure that the environmental concerns from their communities are able to be addressed with me. I’ve talked to the mayor myself. We’re going to meet. We’re also looking at an urban drilling policy. We’re working on that piece right now. What is important for me is the safety of Albertans, all Albertans.

Mr. Bilous: Mr. Speaker, given that there are still no clear rules on drilling in urban areas and given that this PC government has been promising an urban drilling strategy since 2012, when Calgary faced the same threat that Lethbridge does today, to the Minister of Energy: when will we finally get to see this policy, and why has it taken so long? 

Mrs. McQueen: Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. Indeed, we do have policies about drilling in this province, whether they be for urban or rural, and I have made a commitment to look at the policies, review the policies, and bring forward different stakeholders, municipalities and other stakeholders, so that we can look at those policies, first of all, so that everyone is aware what policies we do have in place. Whether we live in rural Alberta or we live in urban Alberta, it’s important for all of us to have policies for safe drilling.

Mr. Bilous: Tick-tock, tick-tock, Minister. Mr. Speaker, given that without this policy the government and regulators continue to make up rules on the fly in the backroom and given the strong opposition from Albertans, including in Lethbridge the mayor and city council, the chamber of commerce, and both school boards, to the Minister of Municipal Affairs: will the minister commit that changes to the Municipal Government Act will include a prohibition on drilling in urban areas, and if not, why not?

Mrs. McQueen: Well, again thank you for the question. What’s important to note, Mr. Speaker, in this particular case is that there has been no application put forward to the Alberta Energy Regulator, so the citizens are having the opportunity to bring their concerns first and foremost to their two outstanding MLAs – the mayor is able to talk with myself as well – and to be able to talk about those. But, quite frankly, there is no application before the regulator at this point.

white

Lethbridge County adds voice to concerns over urban drilling

By Simmons, Garrett on March 10, 2014.

Stan Ashbee

southern alberta newspapers

There’s oil in them there hills – foothills that is. Considered black gold by some. Oil and gas exploration has been at the forefront in Lethbridge and surrounding area over the past few years. Whether it’s good or bad for municipalities will continue to be debated.

At a Lethbridge County council meeting Thursday, a motion was passed that Lethbridge County council send a letter to Robin Campbell, Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development minister, that recognizes the value the oil and gas industry adds to Alberta and also encourages legislative changes that will give local governments in Alberta a stronger voice on resource extraction matters in areas that impact municipalities. Deputy Reeve Henry Doeve opposed the motion.

“I don’t want to be drawn into the City of Lethbridge’s issues. They’re making an issue out of something that is not an issue,” said Doeve. “There’s pretty good stop gaps in place now. They can’t drill in the middle of my house now,” he added.

A recommendation was made after a letter from City of Lethbridge Mayor Chris Spearman was submitted to county council asking whether county council would consider passing a resolution expressing concern about the absence of municipal authority respecting resource drilling within municipal boundaries.

“I think we could have some say in it. I mean it has nothing to do with the Lethbridge issue but potentially they could want to drill next to a hamlet or on a road where it absolutely won’t handle truck traffic. Next thing you know they’ve got 50 trucks a day on some of these roads,” noted Coun. Steve Campbell.

In a recommendation to council from Larry Randle, director of community services, Lethbridge County recognizes the benefits of natural resource extraction and values the oil and gas industry and all the benefits it brings to Alberta. The information submitted also stated having a stronger voice in local area resource extraction would provide the county and other local governments with an enhanced ability to plan for the future.

“We have lots of rules and regulations in place already,” said Coun. Morris Zeinstra.

Lethbridge County Reeve Lorne Hickey added if oil exploration ends up next to hamlets or residential areas it would be beneficial to have a clearer understanding of the development and also a small say in how it occurs.

“Could it be up wind or down wind or how could we do this differently to accommodate the people that live there?” said Hickey, adding while not sacrificing any of the economy.

Doeve asked council if there is indeed a problem. “There’s lots of oil and gas exploration going on all over the place,” he said, adding because of procedures already in place it’s not a problem.

Doeve added he hasn’t heard of any problems in the hamlets within the area and there are currently many safety measures in place.

white

Redford using extra cash to hire letter writers

By Dean Bennett  The Canadian Press
March 7, 2014 3:22 pm

EDMONTON – Alberta Premier Alison Redford’s office says it will use $300,000 of a $1.2-million boost in its budget this year to hire more letter writers.

Neala Barton, Redford’s spokeswoman, said Friday the premier needs to respond better to the high volume of correspondence from Albertans.

Barton said the goal is “to speed up how quickly we’re getting back to Albertans.”

She could not say how many new letter writers will be hired or how many are already handling correspondence for Redford.

 Related Stories

Earlier Friday, Barton said the figure to be spent on the hires was one-third of the $1.2 million, which would have been $440,000, but she later clarified that it was one-quarter.

She said the remaining $900,000 will be used to pay off internal contractual obligations and to hold more events to persuade dignitaries to visit and invest in the province.

The increase brings Redford’s office budget to $12.8 million — a 9.4 per cent increase from the previous year.

Opposition critics called it more hypocritical waste from a premier under fire over revelations of lavish travel spending while freezing public sector wages and letting program spending lag.

“She’s putting herself and the members of her inner circle above the very people she’s supposed to serve,” said Liberal Leader Raj Sherman. “Redford is really rubbing it in the face of Albertans.

“With $1.2 million, Redford can actually hire 20 teachers for a whole year.”

NDP Leader Brian Mason said the budget increase for the premier’s office widens the divide between Redford and Albertans.

“It’s another example of the tale of two Albertas: one for the premier and her entourage and the other for the rest of us, who are expected to make do with less.”

On Thursday, Redford’s government delivered a second consecutive budget that held the line on spending in a province leading the country in economic and population growth.

On Friday, her team fanned out across Alberta to talk about the budget.

Redford’s office said she had no events or media availabilities.

It was the end to a rough first week back in the legislature for a premier who has been hounded by opponents for weeks to repay $45,000 for a trip she and her aide took in December to attend Nelson Mandela’s funeral. The trip included use of a government plane and first-class air tickets. Nova Scotia’s premier made the same trip for under $1,000.

There have been other revelations, including one that Redford billed taxpayers for a $9,000 ride back from a Palm Springs vacation on a government plane to attend former premier Ralph Klein’s funeral.

On Tuesday, Redford admitted that for over a year she had been flying her daughter and her daughter’s friends around on government planes. She repaid $3,100 to cover the cost of the friends.

She has now grounded all out-of-province government plane trips and has asked the auditor general to determine if taxpayers are getting value for money on government aircraft.

On Wednesday, when opposition members pointed out it’s against government policy for Redford to fly her daughter on government planes, she said it’s time to change the rules to reflect that “you have a premier who has a 12-year-old daughter.”

Mason said Redford is holding up her being a working mom to ignore rules that don’t work for her.

“We’ve heard from a lot of working mothers that they resent it very much,” he said.

“They struggle to balance work and family. They do not have the luxury of government airplanes to bring them back from Palm Springs. They don’t have the ability to change the rules to suit themselves.

“I think it’s actually created more resentment than sympathy.”

white